Lipscomb
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
718  Brent Leber FR 33:20
1,406  Kyle Johnson FR 34:16
1,412  William Kachman FR 34:16
1,420  Zach Israel FR 34:17
1,495  Sam Remington JR 34:25
1,499  Andrew Ayers SO 34:25
1,575  Jonathan Schwind FR 34:31
1,591  Robert Rupp SO 34:32
1,634  Ryan Speer SO 34:36
1,651  Psalm Ocampo SO 34:38
1,656  Owen Glogovsky FR 34:38
1,676  Jared Daedler SR 34:40
1,772  John Green FR 34:46
1,861  Daniel Lenart SR 34:55
1,909  Max McBride SR 35:00
1,928  Robert Lockwood FR 35:02
2,000  Mitch Zabka JR 35:08
2,058  Brody Beiler FR 35:16
2,169  Sam Shaylor FR 35:30
2,473  Jared Peters SO 36:15
2,577  Austin Peters SO 36:35
National Rank #185 of 312
South Region Rank #17 of 40
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 15th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.4%
Top 20 in Regional 95.4%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Brent Leber Kyle Johnson William Kachman Zach Israel Sam Remington Andrew Ayers Jonathan Schwind Robert Rupp Ryan Speer Psalm Ocampo Owen Glogovsky
Commadore Classic 09/17 1153 32:59 33:57 33:58 33:41 34:12 34:27 34:51
Texas A&M Invitational 09/24 1196 33:13 35:27 34:33 34:22 34:21 34:35 34:23
APSU Cross Country Invitational 09/24
Upstate Invitational 10/01 1196 33:23 34:34 34:48 34:02 34:15 34:20 34:57 35:07 34:59 35:02
Alabama Crimson Classic 10/14 1195 33:20 34:23 34:10 35:07 34:21 34:27 34:33 34:29 34:53 34:22 34:39
ASUN Championship 10/29 1192 34:06 33:58 33:59 34:15 33:50 34:31 34:59 35:26
South Region Championships 11/11 1186 33:13 33:51 34:08 34:33 34:35





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 15.8 461 0.4 2.1 6.8 9.6 14.8 15.6 14.7 11.4 9.1 6.6 4.5 3.0 1.7



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Brent Leber 50.4 0.1 0.2 0.2
Kyle Johnson 103.3
William Kachman 102.9
Zach Israel 104.1
Sam Remington 111.2
Andrew Ayers 111.0
Jonathan Schwind 119.0




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 0.4% 0.4 10
11 2.1% 2.1 11
12 6.8% 6.8 12
13 9.6% 9.6 13
14 14.8% 14.8 14
15 15.6% 15.6 15
16 14.7% 14.7 16
17 11.4% 11.4 17
18 9.1% 9.1 18
19 6.6% 6.6 19
20 4.5% 4.5 20
21 3.0% 3.0 21
22 1.7% 1.7 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0