UC Irvine
Men -
Women
2015
-
2016 -
2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
537 |
Isaiah Thompson |
SR |
32:59 |
872 |
Izzak Mireles |
JR |
33:33 |
899 |
Hector Garcia |
FR |
33:35 |
1,045 |
Branden Randall |
SO |
33:48 |
1,147 |
Nolan Del Valle |
SR |
33:56 |
1,528 |
Eric Lawver |
SO |
34:27 |
1,569 |
Ashton Garcia |
JR |
34:31 |
|
National Rank |
#138 of 312 |
West Region Rank |
#18 of 32 |
Chance of Advancing to Nationals |
0.0% |
Most Likely Finish |
18th at Regional |
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
0.0% |
Top 10 in Regional |
0.0% |
Top 20 in Regional |
84.3% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Isaiah Thompson |
Izzak Mireles |
Hector Garcia |
Branden Randall |
Nolan Del Valle |
Eric Lawver |
Ashton Garcia |
UC Riverside Invitational |
09/17 |
1104 |
32:48 |
33:02 |
33:48 |
33:27 |
34:18 |
34:54 |
34:24 |
Mustang Challenge |
10/01 |
1159 |
33:07 |
33:23 |
34:16 |
|
33:55 |
34:18 |
34:29 |
Big West Championship |
10/29 |
1104 |
32:43 |
33:50 |
33:11 |
33:55 |
33:37 |
34:15 |
34:41 |
West Region Championships |
11/11 |
1177 |
35:00 |
33:34 |
33:26 |
34:12 |
33:41 |
34:35 |
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region Championship |
100% |
17.7 |
553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.5 |
2.4 |
6.8 |
12.9 |
13.8 |
12.9 |
14.7 |
11.0 |
9.4 |
7.8 |
4.0 |
1.8 |
1.1 |
0.6 |
0.4 |
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Isaiah Thompson |
74.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Izzak Mireles |
103.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hector Garcia |
106.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Branden Randall |
121.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nolan Del Valle |
132.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eric Lawver |
165.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ashton Garcia |
170.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
7 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
8 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
9 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
10 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
11 |
0.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
11 |
12 |
0.5% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
12 |
13 |
2.4% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
6.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
14 |
15 |
12.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
15 |
16 |
13.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
16 |
17 |
12.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
17 |
18 |
14.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
18 |
19 |
11.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
19 |
20 |
9.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
20 |
21 |
7.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
21 |
22 |
4.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
22 |
23 |
1.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
23 |
24 |
1.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
24 |
25 |
0.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
25 |
26 |
0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
|
Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
0.0 |