Arizona
Men -
Women
2016
-
2017 -
2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
275 |
Hunter Davila |
SO |
32:22 |
319 |
Carlos Villarreal |
SO |
32:30 |
654 |
Seamus White |
SO |
33:07 |
796 |
Travis Thorne |
JR |
33:22 |
1,198 |
Henry Weisberg |
FR |
33:55 |
1,466 |
Daniom Tecle |
SR |
34:16 |
1,962 |
Chase McQueen |
FR |
35:02 |
|
National Rank |
#90 of 315 |
West Region Rank |
#13 of 33 |
Chance of Advancing to Nationals |
0.0% |
Most Likely Finish |
13th at Regional |
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
0.0% |
Top 10 in Regional |
0.1% |
Top 20 in Regional |
99.8% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Hunter Davila |
Carlos Villarreal |
Seamus White |
Travis Thorne |
Henry Weisberg |
Daniom Tecle |
Chase McQueen |
Paul Short Gold |
09/29 |
964 |
32:44 |
31:57 |
33:01 |
33:26 |
33:53 |
34:00 |
33:55 |
Pre-Nationals (Red) |
10/14 |
1022 |
32:02 |
|
33:16 |
33:02 |
33:43 |
34:13 |
35:09 |
Pac-12 Championship |
10/27 |
983 |
31:58 |
32:56 |
33:01 |
33:31 |
33:55 |
34:25 |
35:51 |
West Region Championships |
11/10 |
1105 |
|
32:33 |
33:09 |
33:29 |
34:17 |
34:32 |
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region Championship |
100% |
13.7 |
456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
1.6 |
19.6 |
31.3 |
23.4 |
12.9 |
6.7 |
2.3 |
1.2 |
0.6 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Hunter Davila |
0.7% |
148.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Hunter Davila |
51.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
Carlos Villarreal |
57.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seamus White |
91.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Travis Thorne |
103.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Henry Weisberg |
137.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniom Tecle |
156.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chase McQueen |
196.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
7 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
8 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
9 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
10 |
0.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
10 |
11 |
1.6% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
11 |
12 |
19.6% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
12 |
13 |
31.3% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.3 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
23.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
14 |
15 |
12.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
15 |
16 |
6.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
16 |
17 |
2.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
17 |
18 |
1.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
18 |
19 |
0.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
19 |
20 |
0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
20 |
21 |
0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
21 |
22 |
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
22 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
Tennessee |
1.2% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
|
Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
1.0 |