Binghamton
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
394  Dan Schaffer FR 32:38
831  Eric Holt SR 33:25
1,462  Tim Courts FR 34:16
1,628  Billy Hector JR 34:30
1,808  Nathaniel Howe JR 34:48
1,832  Mitch Halpern FR 34:50
1,886  Matthew Gill JR 34:55
2,145  Grayson Hoteling FR 35:24
2,565  Shamar Powell SO 36:40
2,914  Michael Mallow FR 39:42
National Rank #159 of 315
Northeast Region Rank #20 of 42
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 25th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 11.9%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Dan Schaffer Eric Holt Tim Courts Billy Hector Nathaniel Howe Mitch Halpern Matthew Gill Grayson Hoteling Shamar Powell Michael Mallow
UB Stampede Invite 09/15 1180 32:12 34:14 35:01 35:50 35:56
Paul Short Gold 09/29 1228 34:15 34:39 33:47 34:33 35:06
UAlbany Invite 10/14 1439 34:23 35:39 36:42 36:40 39:42
America East Championship 10/28 1185 33:22 33:59 33:37 34:30 36:01 35:17 34:21 35:20
Northeast Region Championships 11/10 1082 32:30 32:45 34:30 35:12 34:10 34:14 34:41





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 24.4 668 0.1 0.6 1.2 2.1 3.5 4.5 6.7 7.3 9.0 12.2 14.0 11.1 12.0 7.5 5.4 2.4 0.6



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Dan Schaffer 0.2% 167.3


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Dan Schaffer 36.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.4 0.9 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.2 1.6 2.2 1.9 3.0 2.1
Eric Holt 89.5
Tim Courts 161.4
Billy Hector 180.1
Nathaniel Howe 200.7
Mitch Halpern 201.7
Matthew Gill 206.9




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 0.1% 0.1 15
16 0.6% 0.6 16
17 1.2% 1.2 17
18 2.1% 2.1 18
19 3.5% 3.5 19
20 4.5% 4.5 20
21 6.7% 6.7 21
22 7.3% 7.3 22
23 9.0% 9.0 23
24 12.2% 12.2 24
25 14.0% 14.0 25
26 11.1% 11.1 26
27 12.0% 12.0 27
28 7.5% 7.5 28
29 5.4% 5.4 29
30 2.4% 2.4 30
31 0.6% 0.6 31
32 0.2% 0.2 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0