Grambling
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,050  Hassan Chepkwony JR 33:41
2,012  Noah Rugut SO 35:08
2,349  Aaron Koech SO 35:56
2,527  Jeremiah Kimeli JR 36:29
2,643  Hillary Kiprop SO 37:01
National Rank #266 of 315
South Central Region Rank #28 of 36
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 28th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Hassan Chepkwony Noah Rugut Aaron Koech Jeremiah Kimeli Hillary Kiprop
Lois Davis Invitational 10/06 1345 33:25 34:33 35:16 37:36 37:25
Mississippi College Invitational 10/14 1365 33:57 35:51 35:13 36:36 37:36





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 28.2 773 0.2 1.5 6.3 20.5 31.2 22.9 17.0 0.6



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Hassan Chepkwony 61.9
Noah Rugut 142.0
Aaron Koech 171.8
Jeremiah Kimeli 188.1
Hillary Kiprop 200.9




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 0.2% 0.2 24
25 1.5% 1.5 25
26 6.3% 6.3 26
27 20.5% 20.5 27
28 31.2% 31.2 28
29 22.9% 22.9 29
30 17.0% 17.0 30
31 0.6% 0.6 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0