Pepperdine
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
292  Nick Heath JR 32:25
498  Kevin Maeda SR 32:50
1,567  Kyle Johnson FR 34:24
1,632  Preston Gromer FR 34:31
1,708  Alex Egan FR 34:38
1,883  Jalen Frantal SO 34:54
1,982  Justin Touhey FR 35:04
2,097  Tim Wells FR 35:19
2,442  Treet Allison SO 36:14
National Rank #130 of 315
West Region Rank #18 of 33
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 21st at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 37.9%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Nick Heath Kevin Maeda Kyle Johnson Preston Gromer Alex Egan Jalen Frantal Justin Touhey Tim Wells Treet Allison
UCR Invitational 09/16 1138 32:50 32:44 33:46 35:58 35:21 35:18 37:00
West Coast Conference 10/27 1078 32:06 33:02 35:05 34:36 35:18 34:33 34:51 35:19 36:14
West Region Championships 11/10 1084 32:30 32:46 34:28 34:26 34:07 34:12 35:02





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 21.1 644 0.5 1.4 3.9 6.6 10.5 15.3 18.8 17.7 13.5 7.3 3.0 1.2 0.6 0.2 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Nick Heath 0.2% 157.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Nick Heath 54.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2
Kevin Maeda 76.3
Kyle Johnson 163.4
Preston Gromer 167.8
Alex Egan 175.2
Jalen Frantal 191.0
Justin Touhey 198.9




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 0.5% 0.5 15
16 1.4% 1.4 16
17 3.9% 3.9 17
18 6.6% 6.6 18
19 10.5% 10.5 19
20 15.3% 15.3 20
21 18.8% 18.8 21
22 17.7% 17.7 22
23 13.5% 13.5 23
24 7.3% 7.3 24
25 3.0% 3.0 25
26 1.2% 1.2 26
27 0.6% 0.6 27
28 0.2% 0.2 28
29 29
30 30
31 0.1% 0.1 31
32 32
33 33
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0