Rice
Men -
Women
2016
-
2017 -
2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
609 |
Hociel Landa |
FR |
33:03 |
849 |
Marco Ruiz |
SR |
33:27 |
907 |
Adolfo Carvalho |
SO |
33:31 |
1,013 |
Imran Bell |
JR |
33:39 |
1,040 |
Clay Musial |
JR |
33:41 |
1,058 |
Matt Calem |
JR |
33:42 |
1,378 |
Bradley Dohner |
JR |
34:10 |
1,484 |
Alex Topini |
FR |
34:18 |
|
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
19.2% |
Top 10 in Regional |
91.8% |
Top 20 in Regional |
100.0% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Hociel Landa |
Marco Ruiz |
Adolfo Carvalho |
Imran Bell |
Clay Musial |
Matt Calem |
Bradley Dohner |
Alex Topini |
Texas A&M Invitational |
09/23 |
1098 |
32:50 |
34:29 |
33:31 |
33:19 |
33:30 |
33:13 |
34:41 |
34:14 |
Pre-Nationals (Red) |
10/14 |
1138 |
33:25 |
33:25 |
33:28 |
33:44 |
33:17 |
33:42 |
|
34:46 |
Conference USA Championship |
10/28 |
1122 |
32:55 |
33:24 |
33:57 |
34:21 |
33:38 |
33:33 |
33:45 |
33:51 |
South Region Championships |
11/10 |
1130 |
33:05 |
33:28 |
33:23 |
33:45 |
33:40 |
34:48 |
|
34:25 |
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region Championship |
100% |
7.6 |
254 |
|
|
0.6 |
6.8 |
11.9 |
14.2 |
15.8 |
17.8 |
14.0 |
10.9 |
5.0 |
2.1 |
0.6 |
0.4 |
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Hociel Landa |
32.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.7 |
0.9 |
1.6 |
1.6 |
2.5 |
2.9 |
2.8 |
4.3 |
4.0 |
Marco Ruiz |
49.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
Adolfo Carvalho |
52.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
Imran Bell |
60.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clay Musial |
61.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matt Calem |
61.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bradley Dohner |
87.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
3 |
0.6% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
3 |
4 |
6.8% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
4 |
5 |
11.9% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
5 |
6 |
14.2% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
6 |
7 |
15.8% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
7 |
8 |
17.8% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
8 |
9 |
14.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
9 |
10 |
10.9% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
10 |
11 |
5.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
11 |
12 |
2.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
12 |
13 |
0.6% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
14 |
15 |
0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
|
Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
0.0 |