Troy
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
830  Brackin Stewart SO 33:25
1,172  Bradley Dixon SO 33:53
1,250  Brennan Garriques JR 34:00
1,306  Sawyer Sprung JR 34:04
1,710  Daniel Glick SO 34:38
2,485  Delaney Moore FR 36:21
2,673  Thomas Ward FR 37:12
2,855  Christian Anderton SO 38:39
National Rank #192 of 315
South Region Rank #22 of 41
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 18th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 66.3%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Brackin Stewart Bradley Dixon Brennan Garriques Sawyer Sprung Daniel Glick Delaney Moore Thomas Ward Christian Anderton
Foothills Invitational 09/30 1127 33:15 33:13 33:29 33:26 33:51 35:28 37:18 37:47
Crimson Classic 10/13 1169 33:29 33:42 34:04 33:41 34:09 36:21 37:33 39:45
Sun Belt Championship 10/28 1187 33:25 33:54 33:51 33:34 35:05 37:27 36:44
South Region Championships 11/10 1252 33:33 34:16 34:00 35:17 36:15





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 19.5 554 0.1 0.2 1.4 6.5 12.7 16.1 15.0 14.4 14.7 9.4 5.5 2.5 1.4 0.4



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Brackin Stewart 72.7
Bradley Dixon 102.6
Brennan Garriques 110.3
Sawyer Sprung 114.2
Daniel Glick 141.9
Delaney Moore 201.7
Thomas Ward 222.9




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 0.1% 0.1 13
14 0.2% 0.2 14
15 1.4% 1.4 15
16 6.5% 6.5 16
17 12.7% 12.7 17
18 16.1% 16.1 18
19 15.0% 15.0 19
20 14.4% 14.4 20
21 14.7% 14.7 21
22 9.4% 9.4 22
23 5.5% 5.5 23
24 2.5% 2.5 24
25 1.4% 1.4 25
26 0.4% 0.4 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0