UC Riverside
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
664  Arman Irani SO 33:07
1,120  Jonathan Lee FR 33:48
1,203  Solomon Demeku-Ousman JR 33:55
1,591  James Sever SO 34:26
1,613  Justin Eipp FR 34:28
1,670  Brandon Shields SO 34:34
1,723  Jack Frimodig FR 34:39
2,151  Andres Delgado SO 35:25
2,481  Heinrich Van Niekerk FR 36:21
National Rank #183 of 315
West Region Rank #23 of 33
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 24th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 12.2%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Arman Irani Jonathan Lee Solomon Demeku-Ousman James Sever Justin Eipp Brandon Shields Jack Frimodig Andres Delgado Heinrich Van Niekerk
UCR Invitational 09/16 1173 33:01 34:11 34:58 34:27 34:25 34:05 35:24
Joe Piane Invitational (Gold) 09/29 1106 32:34 33:39 33:22 33:38 34:11 34:21 34:53
Big West Championship 10/28 1188 33:20 33:42 35:11 34:25 34:33 34:10 34:46 35:26 36:21
West Region Championships 11/10 1196 33:05 34:06 34:33 34:42 35:16 34:48 36:18





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 23.1 690 0.1 0.7 1.4 3.2 7.0 8.9 16.8 19.2 19.5 11.9 6.3 2.8 1.4 0.9 0.2 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Arman Irani 92.5
Jonathan Lee 130.5
Solomon Demeku-Ousman 136.5
James Sever 164.5
Justin Eipp 166.4
Brandon Shields 171.5
Jack Frimodig 177.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 0.1% 0.1 16
17 0.7% 0.7 17
18 1.4% 1.4 18
19 3.2% 3.2 19
20 7.0% 7.0 20
21 8.9% 8.9 21
22 16.8% 16.8 22
23 19.2% 19.2 23
24 19.5% 19.5 24
25 11.9% 11.9 25
26 6.3% 6.3 26
27 2.8% 2.8 27
28 1.4% 1.4 28
29 0.9% 0.9 29
30 0.2% 0.2 30
31 0.1% 0.1 31
32 32
33 33
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0