Dartmouth
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
2  Abbey D'Agostino JR 19:03
185  Dana Giordano FR 20:20
318  Hannah Rowe JR 20:38
545  Christie Rutledge FR 21:02
549  Sarah Delozier SO 21:02
760  Kate Sullivan SR 21:18
812  Alison Lanois SO 21:21
911  Samantha Harmon SO 21:27
924  Claudia Pham SO 21:28
933  Sarah Bennett FR 21:29
964  Katelyn Walker JR 21:31
1,006  Ashley Ulrich SO 21:34
1,201  Reid Watson FR 21:48
1,257  Margaret Donovan SO 21:51
1,445  Abby Markowitz FR 22:04
1,698  Arianna Vailas JR 22:19
2,294  Jillian Corcoran SO 22:59
2,537  Julia Harrison SO 23:18
3,065  Elizabeth Markowitz FR 24:09
National Rank #42 of 339
Northeast Region Rank #9 of 42
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 10.9%
Most Likely Finish 9th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.9%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 9.1%
Top 10 in Regional 90.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Abbey D'Agostino Dana Giordano Hannah Rowe Christie Rutledge Sarah Delozier Kate Sullivan Alison Lanois Samantha Harmon Claudia Pham Sarah Bennett Katelyn Walker
Lehigh's Paul Short Run (Gold) 09/28 560 19:15 20:13 20:38 20:12 20:34 21:23 21:43 21:09 22:02
All New England Championship 10/07 1192 21:18 21:12 21:40 21:31
Wisconsin adidas Invitational 10/12 1026 20:26 20:40 21:02 21:39 21:48
Brown University Rothenberg Invitational 10/19 1219 21:29 21:28
Ivy League Championships 10/27 975 20:19 20:30 21:16 21:18 21:31 21:19 21:22
Northeast Region Championships 11/09 782 19:25 20:21 20:48 21:52 21:37 20:51 21:30
NCAA Championship 11/17 18:50





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 10.9% 26.2 585 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.2 0.6 0.6 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.3 0.9
Region Championship 100% 8.1 225 0.3 2.0 6.7 11.7 16.4 18.6 19.2 15.1 7.1 2.4 0.4 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Abbey D'Agostino 100% 3.7 18.1 13.4 11.3 10.5 7.7 6.7 4.7 4.3 3.3 2.9 2.7 2.3 1.5 1.3 1.4 0.9 1.0 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.3
Dana Giordano 17.7% 120.5
Hannah Rowe 11.0% 168.4
Christie Rutledge 10.9% 218.8
Sarah Delozier 10.9% 219.0
Kate Sullivan 10.9% 237.9
Alison Lanois 10.9% 241.1


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Abbey D'Agostino 1.0 81.5 10.8 4.7 1.9 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Dana Giordano 28.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.5 1.0 0.9 1.3 1.9 1.8 2.2 2.6 2.5 3.2 3.1 3.6 3.3 3.0 3.2 3.1
Hannah Rowe 48.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.9
Christie Rutledge 72.7
Sarah Delozier 73.0
Kate Sullivan 90.1
Alison Lanois 93.3




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 0.3% 100.0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.3 3
4 2.0% 77.2% 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.5 1.6 4
5 6.7% 54.5% 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.6 0.9 1.0 0.5 3.1 3.7 5
6 11.7% 31.7% 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.1 1.2 8.0 3.7 6
7 16.4% 8.9% 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.5 0.6 15.0 1.5 7
8 18.6% 1.1% 0.0 0.0 0.2 18.4 0.2 8
9 19.2% 0.1% 0.0 19.1 0.0 9
10 15.1% 15.1 10
11 7.1% 7.1 11
12 2.4% 2.4 12
13 0.4% 0.4 13
14 0.0% 0.0 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
Total 100% 10.9% 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.3 1.0 1.3 2.2 2.9 2.6 89.1 0.0 10.9




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Providence 99.9% 1.0 1.0
Villanova 78.2% 1.0 0.8
Harvard 2.0% 1.0 0.0
Brown 0.5% 1.0 0.0
Texas A&M 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Total 1.8
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 4.0