Drake
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
433  Kirsten Lake SR 20:51
1,054  Taylor Scholl FR 21:38
1,842  Cassie Aerts FR 22:28
1,881  Emma Huston FR 22:30
1,885  Amanda Marwitz JR 22:30
1,928  Celeste Arteaga FR 22:33
2,167  Mariel Fulton SO 22:50
2,277  Allie Heifner JR 22:58
2,482  Erin Dobey FR 23:13
2,649  Stephanie Parks SO 23:26
2,811  Emma Johnson FR 23:40
2,884  Juli Smith FR 23:47
2,941  Cammy Dole SR 23:54
3,171  Laura Gann FR 24:25
National Rank #156 of 339
Midwest Region Rank #23 of 35
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 22nd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 2.6%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Kirsten Lake Taylor Scholl Cassie Aerts Emma Huston Amanda Marwitz Celeste Arteaga Mariel Fulton Allie Heifner Erin Dobey Stephanie Parks Emma Johnson
Roy Griak Invitational 09/29 1137 20:22 21:59 21:56 22:32 22:33 22:22 22:58 22:56 23:38 23:40
Bradley Classic 10/12 1236 21:16 21:40 22:28 22:14 22:33 22:37 22:29 22:55 23:13 23:14 23:40
Missouri Valley Championships 10/27 1205 20:54 21:32 22:54 22:34 22:31 22:30 22:59 23:02
Midwest Region Championships 11/09 1264 21:25 22:33 22:40 22:19 22:51 23:05





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 23.1 662 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 1.9 7.8 33.3 25.0 14.2 8.0 4.8 2.8 1.1 0.4



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Kirsten Lake 45.8 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.7 1.0
Taylor Scholl 111.4
Cassie Aerts 169.3
Emma Huston 171.1
Amanda Marwitz 171.5
Celeste Arteaga 175.1
Mariel Fulton 190.0




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 0.0% 0.0 16
17 0.1% 0.1 17
18 0.2% 0.2 18
19 0.4% 0.4 19
20 1.9% 1.9 20
21 7.8% 7.8 21
22 33.3% 33.3 22
23 25.0% 25.0 23
24 14.2% 14.2 24
25 8.0% 8.0 25
26 4.8% 4.8 26
27 2.8% 2.8 27
28 1.1% 1.1 28
29 0.4% 0.4 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0