Duquesne
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
189  Amber Valimont JR 20:21
634  Haley Pisarcik JR 21:09
685  Danica Snyder SO 21:12
928  Hannah Scipio FR 21:29
1,391  Jenna Gigliotti SO 21:59
1,658  Elise Farris SO 22:17
1,739  Kendall Seymour SO 22:21
1,793  Abbie Marquard FR 22:25
2,403  Shelby Haitz JR 23:07
National Rank #102 of 339
Mid-Atlantic Region Rank #8 of 38
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 9th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.1%
Top 10 in Regional 92.6%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Amber Valimont Haley Pisarcik Danica Snyder Hannah Scipio Jenna Gigliotti Elise Farris Kendall Seymour Abbie Marquard Shelby Haitz
Lehigh's Paul Short Run (Gold) 09/28 995 20:13 21:09 20:36 21:52 21:45 22:27 22:28 22:27
Pre-Nationals Meet (Red) 10/13 1076 20:21 21:04 21:17 21:48 21:54 22:20 22:20
Pre-Nationals Meet (Black) 10/13 22:00
Atlantic 10 Championships 10/27 1183 21:04 21:15 21:14 22:13 21:51 22:33 22:29 23:07
Mid-Atlantic Region Championships 11/09 1117 20:33 21:26 21:32 21:07 22:11 22:29 22:25





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 8.9 283 0.1 1.0 7.9 24.0 43.9 15.7 5.0 1.7 0.5 0.2



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Amber Valimont 32.0% 131.9
Danica Snyder 0.0% 165.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Amber Valimont 17.8 0.0 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.1 2.2 2.6 3.2 3.8 4.4 4.6 4.8 5.1 5.7 6.0 5.3 6.4 6.6 6.5 5.4 4.7 3.9 3.7
Haley Pisarcik 46.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4
Danica Snyder 49.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1
Hannah Scipio 66.0 0.0
Jenna Gigliotti 99.1
Elise Farris 124.1
Kendall Seymour 130.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 0.1% 0.1 5
6 1.0% 1.0 6
7 7.9% 7.9 7
8 24.0% 24.0 8
9 43.9% 43.9 9
10 15.7% 15.7 10
11 5.0% 5.0 11
12 1.7% 1.7 12
13 0.5% 0.5 13
14 0.2% 0.2 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0