Georgetown
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
62  Madeline Chambers SO 19:49
101  Katrina Coogan SO 20:02
121  Kirsten Kasper SR 20:06
145  Annamarie Maag SO 20:13
164  Emily Jones SR 20:17
171  Rachel Schneider JR 20:18
175  Samantha Nadel FR 20:20
321  Jenna Davidner SO 20:38
333  Hannah Neczypor SO 20:40
605  Meaghan Gregory SR 21:06
649  Kelsey Smith FR 21:10
698  Chelsea Cox JR 21:13
1,031  Shanique Dasilva JR 21:36
National Rank #12 of 339
Mid-Atlantic Region Rank #1 of 38
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 100.0%
Most Likely Finish 11th at Nationals


National Champion 0.5%
Top 5 at Nationals 10.1%
Top 10 at Nationals 36.7%
Top 20 at Nationals 86.0%


Regional Champion 65.5%
Top 5 in Regional 100.0%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Madeline Chambers Katrina Coogan Kirsten Kasper Annamarie Maag Emily Jones Rachel Schneider Samantha Nadel Jenna Davidner Hannah Neczypor Meaghan Gregory Kelsey Smith
Lehigh's Paul Short Run (Gold) 09/28 483 19:52 20:24 19:57 20:08 20:30 20:18 21:06 21:30
Pre-Nationals Meet (Red) 10/13 390 19:58 20:09 20:08 19:47 20:19 20:02 20:58
Pre-Nationals Meet (Black) 10/13 21:06 20:54
Big East Championships 10/26 327 19:39 19:44 20:08 19:54 20:10 20:58 20:04 20:47 20:41
Mid-Atlantic Region Championships 11/09 472 19:46 20:05 20:03 21:22 20:21 20:21 20:52
NCAA Championship 11/17 478 19:49 19:55 20:14 20:24 20:20 20:21 20:17





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 100.0% 13.2 379 0.5 1.2 1.9 2.8 3.6 3.8 4.8 6.1 5.6 6.3 6.7 6.4 6.4 5.7 5.4 5.1 4.1 3.5 3.0 2.9 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.4 1.6 0.9 0.9 0.6 1.0 0.6 0.2
Region Championship 100% 1.5 54 65.5 25.3 7.6 1.6 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Madeline Chambers 100.0% 63.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.3 0.8 0.3 0.7 0.9 0.6
Katrina Coogan 100.0% 93.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1
Kirsten Kasper 100.0% 107.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0
Annamarie Maag 100.0% 126.8 0.0
Emily Jones 100.0% 137.8
Rachel Schneider 100.0% 140.5
Samantha Nadel 100.0% 143.9


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Madeline Chambers 4.3 8.5 11.4 13.1 13.2 11.1 10.0 8.6 6.9 5.0 3.8 2.7 1.9 1.4 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0
Katrina Coogan 9.0 0.6 1.6 3.4 5.3 6.3 7.1 7.8 8.7 8.7 8.8 8.0 7.4 5.6 4.8 4.0 3.2 2.4 1.9 1.2 1.0 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.1
Kirsten Kasper 10.8 0.3 0.7 1.8 3.2 4.3 5.1 5.6 6.7 7.9 7.7 7.9 8.4 7.2 6.4 5.1 4.5 4.0 3.6 2.9 1.6 1.4 1.3 0.8 0.5 0.4
Annamarie Maag 14.1 0.1 0.4 0.7 1.4 1.6 2.7 3.7 4.3 5.4 6.9 6.8 7.3 7.9 8.1 7.7 6.3 5.7 4.6 3.9 3.7 3.0 2.0 1.6 1.1
Emily Jones 16.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 1.1 1.4 1.9 2.7 3.3 3.8 5.4 6.8 6.7 7.1 7.2 7.1 7.3 6.3 6.0 5.3 4.7 3.1 3.1 2.4
Rachel Schneider 16.7 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.6 1.0 1.7 2.7 2.8 4.2 4.3 5.6 6.4 6.9 7.7 7.5 6.7 7.0 6.6 5.4 4.6 3.5 2.7 2.9
Samantha Nadel 17.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 1.0 1.6 1.9 2.5 4.4 4.0 4.7 5.8 6.6 6.8 7.4 8.2 7.1 6.4 6.4 4.4 4.1 3.2 2.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 65.5% 100.0% 65.5 65.5 1
2 25.3% 100.0% 25.3 25.3 2
3 7.6% 100.0% 0.3 0.5 2.9 2.5 0.8 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.6 3
4 1.6% 98.8% 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 1.6 4
5 0.0% 50.0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
Total 100% 100.0% 65.5 25.3 0.3 0.6 3.1 3.0 1.3 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 90.8 9.2




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Providence 99.9% 2.0 2.0
Connecticut 97.5% 1.0 1.0
William and Mary 95.3% 1.0 1.0
Notre Dame 95.3% 1.0 1.0
Texas 94.9% 1.0 0.9
Florida 82.7% 1.0 0.8
Villanova 78.2% 3.0 2.3
Colorado 62.3% 1.0 0.6
Yale 24.0% 1.0 0.2
Kentucky 11.2% 1.0 0.1
Dartmouth 7.5% 1.0 0.1
Syracuse 3.7% 1.0 0.0
Butler 2.8% 1.0 0.0
Southern Utah 2.6% 1.0 0.0
Harvard 2.0% 1.0 0.0
UC Davis 1.1% 1.0 0.0
Illinois 0.7% 1.0 0.0
Brown 0.5% 1.0 0.0
Baylor 0.5% 1.0 0.0
Tulsa 0.5% 1.0 0.0
Clemson 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Air Force 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Ohio U. 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Boise State 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 10.2
Minimum 4.0
Maximum 15.0