Iona
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
256  Katie Niblock JR 20:29
327  Marion Joly-Testault SR 20:39
436  Kirsten Stewart JR 20:51
642  Nicole Cochran SR 21:09
1,513  Luci McLoughlin JR 22:08
1,848  Leigh Mazzella SO 22:28
2,016  Erin Brady SR 22:40
2,110  Marlene Delices SO 22:46
2,236  Courtney Veilleux JR 22:54
3,621  Jenny Kurz SR 26:11
National Rank #83 of 339
Northeast Region Rank #13 of 42
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 14th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 2.3%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Katie Niblock Marion Joly-Testault Kirsten Stewart Nicole Cochran Luci McLoughlin Leigh Mazzella Erin Brady Marlene Delices Courtney Veilleux Jenny Kurz
Greater Louisville Classic (Gold) 09/29 980 20:24 20:39 20:52 21:02 22:16 22:54
Metropolitan Conference Championships 10/05 22:19 22:17 22:23 26:55
Wisconsin adidas Invitational 10/12 958 20:30 20:30 20:42 21:07 22:07 22:51
Princeton Invitational (II) 10/13 22:43 23:19 25:27
MAAC Championships 10/27 1086 20:55 20:40 21:03 21:23 22:04 22:21 22:39 22:53
Northeast Region Championships 11/09 1111 20:19 21:04 22:05 22:47 22:34 26:19





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0% 30.0 651 0.0
Region Championship 100% 13.2 383 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.5 1.5 5.4 13.3 31.8 42.9 3.4 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Katie Niblock 3.6% 135.5
Marion Joly-Testault 0.9% 164.0
Kirsten Stewart 0.0% 136.5
Nicole Cochran 0.0% 207.5
Luci McLoughlin 0.0% 250.5
Leigh Mazzella 0.0% 251.5
Erin Brady 0.0% 252.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Katie Niblock 38.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.7 1.7 1.9 1.9
Marion Joly-Testault 49.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.7 0.4 0.6 0.6
Kirsten Stewart 61.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1
Nicole Cochran 80.6
Luci McLoughlin 149.9
Leigh Mazzella 175.4
Erin Brady 190.7




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 0.0% 100.0% 0.0 0.0 5
6 0.0% 0.0 6
7 0.0% 0.0 7
8 0.2% 0.2 8
9 0.5% 0.5 9
10 1.5% 1.5 10
11 5.4% 5.4 11
12 13.3% 13.3 12
13 31.8% 31.8 13
14 42.9% 42.9 14
15 3.4% 3.4 15
16 0.7% 0.7 16
17 0.2% 0.2 17
18 0.0% 0.0 18
19 0.0% 0.0 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
Total 100% 0.0% 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Dartmouth 7.5% 1.0 0.1
Texas A&M 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.1
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 1.0