Purdue
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
311  Kelly McCurdy SR 20:37
367  Samantha Walkow SR 20:44
496  Blair Doney JR 20:58
604  Dana Payonk JR 21:06
726  Autumn Beachy SO 21:15
748  Laura Maibuecher FR 21:17
796  Sharise Lund FR 21:20
1,036  Haley Goers FR 21:36
1,361  Linsey Daluga JR 21:58
1,491  Marie Lorentz SO 22:07
1,621  Karen Jensen SO 22:14
1,735  Kristen Fritts SO 22:21
2,086  Maria Paolillo JR 22:45
2,557  Katie Hoevet FR 23:19
3,361  Alexis Hoadley FR 24:58
National Rank #87 of 339
Great Lakes Region Rank #10 of 33
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.1%
Most Likely Finish 10th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.8%
Top 10 in Regional 74.5%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Kelly McCurdy Samantha Walkow Blair Doney Dana Payonk Autumn Beachy Laura Maibuecher Sharise Lund Haley Goers Linsey Daluga Marie Lorentz Karen Jensen
Sean Earl Loyola Lakefront Invitational 09/29 1107 20:42 21:08 21:08 21:23 21:34 21:48 22:08 22:15
Wisconsin adidas Invitational 10/12 1076 20:37 21:09 21:41 21:02 21:12 21:21 22:27
Big Ten Championships 10/28 974 20:38 20:40 20:57 20:46 21:23 21:14 21:16 21:37 21:52
Great Lakes Region Championships 11/09 1028 20:36 20:51 21:02 21:00 21:32 21:22 21:12





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.1% 29.3 662 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1
Region Championship 100% 9.8 279 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.2 3.7 8.2 18.6 42.1 21.0 3.7 0.7 0.1 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Kelly McCurdy 1.1% 156.5
Samantha Walkow 0.4% 164.0
Blair Doney 0.1% 167.5
Dana Payonk 0.1% 193.5
Autumn Beachy 0.1% 213.8
Laura Maibuecher 0.1% 215.5
Sharise Lund 0.1% 226.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Kelly McCurdy 37.8 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.7 0.6 0.9 0.8 0.9 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.6
Samantha Walkow 43.7 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.7 0.7 0.7
Blair Doney 56.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1
Dana Payonk 66.8 0.0 0.0
Autumn Beachy 77.5
Laura Maibuecher 80.2
Sharise Lund 83.4




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 0.1% 60.0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 3
4 0.2% 44.4% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 4
5 0.5% 0.5 5
6 1.2% 1.2 6
7 3.7% 3.7 7
8 8.2% 8.2 8
9 18.6% 18.6 9
10 42.1% 42.1 10
11 21.0% 21.0 11
12 3.7% 3.7 12
13 0.7% 0.7 13
14 0.1% 0.1 14
15 0.1% 0.1 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
Total 100% 0.1% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 99.9 0.0 0.1




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Texas A&M 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 1.0