Wofford
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,408  Nicole Klasnic SR 22:00
1,556  Alissa Williams SO 22:10
1,620  Alyssa Burkert JR 22:14
1,826  Sam Hughes JR 22:27
2,064  Marella Angello FR 22:43
2,269  Katie Kessler JR 22:56
2,506  Kim Stauffer SR 23:15
2,679  Carly Egan JR 23:29
2,988  Kiersten Ellsworth SO 23:58
3,117  Nancy Ford FR 24:17
3,148  Andrea Kelsey JR 24:22
National Rank #220 of 339
Southeast Region Rank #33 of 49
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 33rd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Nicole Klasnic Alissa Williams Alyssa Burkert Sam Hughes Marella Angello Katie Kessler Kim Stauffer Carly Egan Kiersten Ellsworth Nancy Ford Andrea Kelsey
UNC-Asheville/ACA Meet 09/29 1260 21:59 22:11 22:16 22:23 22:32 23:06 23:19 23:02 23:58 24:22
Queens Royals Challenge 10/12 1261 22:00 21:57 22:23 22:38 22:26 23:01 23:23 23:19 23:58 24:30
Southern Conference Championships 10/27 1270 21:51 22:47 21:51 22:10 23:00 22:48 23:01 23:46 24:22
Southeast Region Championships 11/09 1276 22:16 22:01 22:22 22:38 22:54 22:53 23:41





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 31.8 881 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.7 0.9 1.6 2.6 4.0 7.1 10.9 12.8



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Nicole Klasnic 150.9
Alissa Williams 165.3
Alyssa Burkert 170.9
Sam Hughes 188.4
Marella Angello 209.9
Katie Kessler 224.3
Kim Stauffer 243.0




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 0.0% 0.0 19
20 20
21 0.0% 0.0 21
22 0.1% 0.1 22
23 0.4% 0.4 23
24 0.7% 0.7 24
25 0.9% 0.9 25
26 1.6% 1.6 26
27 2.6% 2.6 27
28 4.0% 4.0 28
29 7.1% 7.1 29
30 10.9% 10.9 30
31 12.8% 12.8 31
32 15.5% 15.5 32
33 15.8% 15.8 33
34 13.2% 13.2 34
35 8.4% 8.4 35
36 4.4% 4.4 36
37 1.4% 1.4 37
38 0.1% 0.1 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0