Alabama
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
315  Katelyn Greenleaf FR 20:38
424  Elsbeth Denton SR 20:50
631  Meropi Panagiotou FR 21:08
871  Palee Myrex JR 21:24
889  Susie Kemper FR 21:26
989  Claire Turner JR 21:33
1,045  Analisa Patrick FR 21:37
1,087  Kimberley Ficenec FR 21:40
1,144  Abigail Tankersley FR 21:44
1,580  Kim Ficenec FR 22:12
1,613  Rebecca Stover FR 22:14
2,473  Natalie Dimits FR 23:12
National Rank #99 of 339
South Region Rank #8 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.1%
Most Likely Finish 6th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 3.8%
Top 10 in Regional 93.8%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Katelyn Greenleaf Elsbeth Denton Meropi Panagiotou Palee Myrex Susie Kemper Claire Turner Analisa Patrick Kimberley Ficenec Abigail Tankersley Kim Ficenec Rebecca Stover
Notre Dame Invitational (Blue) 09/28 1035 20:49 20:45 20:44 21:32 21:23 21:22 21:43 22:01 22:06
Alabama Crimson Classic 10/13 1049 20:38 20:42 21:06 21:27 21:37 21:25 21:33 21:32 22:17 21:59
SEC Championships 10/26 1098 20:35 21:02 21:36 21:24 21:21 22:03 21:38 21:37 21:41 22:30
South Region Championships 11/09 1044 20:29 20:54 21:10 21:10 21:22 21:34 21:44





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.1% 30.2 725 0.0 0.0 0.0
Region Championship 100% 7.2 279 0.0 0.1 0.2 3.5 44.0 20.3 12.6 7.7 5.4 3.1 1.8 0.9 0.2 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Katelyn Greenleaf 2.7% 158.5
Elsbeth Denton 0.3% 178.5
Meropi Panagiotou 0.1% 202.0
Palee Myrex 0.1% 220.5
Susie Kemper 0.1% 218.0
Claire Turner 0.1% 238.0
Analisa Patrick 0.1% 244.0


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Katelyn Greenleaf 27.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.7 0.8 1.2 1.7 1.4 2.1 2.5 3.2 3.0 3.6 3.8 4.0 3.8 3.8 4.3
Elsbeth Denton 39.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.9 0.6 1.1 0.9 1.4 1.6 2.0
Meropi Panagiotou 58.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1
Palee Myrex 77.0
Susie Kemper 79.1 0.0 0.0
Claire Turner 87.8
Analisa Patrick 91.8




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 0.0% 100.0% 0.0 0.0 2
3 0.1% 66.7% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3
4 0.2% 0.2 4
5 3.5% 3.5 5
6 44.0% 44.0 6
7 20.3% 20.3 7
8 12.6% 12.6 8
9 7.7% 7.7 9
10 5.4% 5.4 10
11 3.1% 3.1 11
12 1.8% 1.8 12
13 0.9% 0.9 13
14 0.2% 0.2 14
15 0.1% 0.1 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 0.1% 0.0 0.0 0.0 99.9 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0