Clemson
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
269  Kate Borowicz SR 20:32
279  Natalie Anthony JR 20:32
297  Erin Barker SR 20:35
753  Cara Talty JR 21:17
817  Alyssa Henshaw JR 21:21
976  Brianna Blanton FR 21:32
1,274  Sara Manesiotis SO 21:52
1,352  Brianna Feerst FR 21:57
1,462  Lisa Girard JR 22:05
National Rank #73 of 339
Southeast Region Rank #8 of 49
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.3%
Most Likely Finish 7th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 14.8%
Top 10 in Regional 95.5%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Kate Borowicz Natalie Anthony Erin Barker Cara Talty Alyssa Henshaw Brianna Blanton Sara Manesiotis Brianna Feerst Lisa Girard
Charlotte Invitational (Gold) 09/28 981 20:21 20:39 20:59 21:18 21:15 21:25 21:37
Charlotte Invitational (Green) 09/28 21:49
Pre-Nationals Meet (Red) 10/13 948 20:39 20:26 20:42 21:21 21:02 21:49 22:05
Pre-Nationals Meet (Black) 10/13 21:40 22:04
ACC Championships 10/27 963 20:48 20:34 20:23 21:14 21:49 21:31 22:10 21:50 22:40
Southeast Region Championships 11/09 895 20:19 20:35 20:23 21:16 21:27 21:27 22:04





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.3% 28.9 668 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1
Region Championship 100% 7.3 252 0.0 0.7 4.1 9.9 19.9 23.1 22.3 10.4 5.0 2.4 1.2 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Kate Borowicz 0.4% 135.0
Natalie Anthony 0.4% 134.5
Erin Barker 0.3% 123.8
Cara Talty 0.3% 222.0
Alyssa Henshaw 0.3% 231.5
Brianna Blanton 0.3% 240.0
Sara Manesiotis 0.3% 250.6


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Kate Borowicz 28.6 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.4 2.3 2.1 2.5 3.0 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.7 4.2 3.8
Natalie Anthony 29.5 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.0 1.3 1.6 1.9 2.4 2.6 2.5 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.6 3.6
Erin Barker 31.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.5 0.7 1.2 1.4 1.5 2.3 1.9 2.9 2.8 3.2 3.2 2.9
Cara Talty 75.6
Alyssa Henshaw 82.3
Brianna Blanton 100.9
Sara Manesiotis 137.8




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 0.0% 100.0% 0.0 0.0 2
3 0.7% 22.9% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.2 3
4 4.1% 1.4% 0.0 0.0 4.1 0.1 4
5 9.9% 0.2% 0.0 9.9 0.0 5
6 19.9% 19.9 6
7 23.1% 23.1 7
8 22.3% 22.3 8
9 10.4% 10.4 9
10 5.0% 5.0 10
11 2.4% 2.4 11
12 1.2% 1.2 12
13 0.6% 0.6 13
14 0.2% 0.2 14
15 0.1% 0.1 15
16 0.1% 0.1 16
17 0.0% 0.0 17
18 0.0% 0.0 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
Total 100% 0.3% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 99.7 0.0 0.2




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Illinois 0.7% 1.0 0.0
Tulsa 0.5% 1.0 0.0
Baylor 0.5% 1.0 0.0
Ohio U. 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Air Force 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 2.0