Iowa
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
8  Mareike Schrulle SR 19:17
151  Megan Ranegar JR 20:15
470  Nicole Benson SR 20:55
594  Kelsey Hart SR 21:05
867  Cynthia Saliba FR 21:24
1,064  Lisa Gordon FR 21:38
1,309  Courtney Martin FR 21:54
1,441  Lena Placzek SO 22:03
1,675  Jocelyn Todd FR 22:18
National Rank #48 of 339
Midwest Region Rank #5 of 35
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.4%
Most Likely Finish 6th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 27.0%
Top 10 in Regional 98.1%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Mareike Schrulle Megan Ranegar Nicole Benson Kelsey Hart Cynthia Saliba Lisa Gordon Courtney Martin Lena Placzek Jocelyn Todd
Roy Griak Invitational 09/29 19:32 20:04 20:49
Wisconsin adidas Invitational 10/12 844 19:31 20:15 21:13 21:25 21:19 21:55
Big Ten Championships 10/28 878 19:40 20:50 20:50 20:55 21:25 21:40 21:46 22:04 22:18
Midwest Region Championships 11/09 758 19:09 20:05 20:45 21:21 21:31 21:38 22:10
NCAA Championship 11/17 19:05





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.4% 25.8 577 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1
Region Championship 100% 6.5 231 0.1 1.0 6.7 19.1 27.1 25.3 11.4 4.7 2.7 1.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Mareike Schrulle 97.9% 11.0 2.2 3.4 4.8 4.5 5.6 5.4 5.1 5.1 4.7 4.3 3.9 3.6 3.6 3.2 3.2 2.9 2.6 2.2 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.7 1.4 1.5 1.4
Megan Ranegar 0.9% 90.5 0.0 0.0
Nicole Benson 0.4% 180.5
Kelsey Hart 0.4% 210.5
Cynthia Saliba 0.4% 231.5
Lisa Gordon 0.4% 244.5
Courtney Martin 0.4% 249.9


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Mareike Schrulle 2.8 8.8 18.2 30.7 26.4 9.6 3.6 1.5 0.6 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0
Megan Ranegar 17.1 0.0 0.1 0.4 1.0 1.8 2.3 3.6 4.7 4.7 6.0 6.0 6.2 6.7 5.8 6.1 5.9 4.8 5.1 4.1 3.3 3.3 3.0
Nicole Benson 50.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.6
Kelsey Hart 65.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1
Cynthia Saliba 92.2
Lisa Gordon 111.7
Courtney Martin 131.9




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 0.1% 100.0% 0.1 0.1 2
3 1.0% 17.3% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.2 3
4 6.7% 1.8% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.6 0.1 4
5 19.1% 0.1% 0.0 19.1 0.0 5
6 27.1% 27.1 6
7 25.3% 25.3 7
8 11.4% 11.4 8
9 4.7% 4.7 9
10 2.7% 2.7 10
11 1.3% 1.3 11
12 0.3% 0.3 12
13 0.1% 0.1 13
14 0.1% 0.1 14
15 0.1% 0.1 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
Total 100% 0.4% 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 99.6 0.1 0.3




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Dartmouth 7.5% 1.0 0.1
Texas A&M 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Virginia 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Northern Arizona 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.1
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 1.0