LSU
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
153  Laura Carleton SR 20:16
407  Natoya Goule JR 20:48
516  Dakota Goodman SR 20:59
654  Charlene Lipsey SR 21:10
834  Brea Goodman SR 21:22
1,018  Leigh-Ann Naccari SR 21:35
1,916  Laura Aleman JR 22:32
1,971  Andria Aguilar SO 22:36
3,103  Morgan Schuetz FR 24:15
3,470  Michelle Mobley JR 25:21
National Rank #80 of 339
South Central Region Rank #5 of 34
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.5%
Most Likely Finish 5th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 62.4%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Laura Carleton Natoya Goule Dakota Goodman Charlene Lipsey Brea Goodman Leigh-Ann Naccari Laura Aleman Andria Aguilar Morgan Schuetz Michelle Mobley
McNeese Cowboy Stampede 09/29 1004 20:23 20:56 20:53 21:25 21:07 21:33 22:23 22:28 24:14 25:45
Chile Pepper Festival 10/13 947 19:51 20:54 21:03 21:19 21:15 21:21 22:22 23:04 24:52
SEC Championships 10/26 964 20:18 20:40 21:06 20:54 21:46 21:33 22:45 22:23 24:15 25:29
South Central Region Championships 11/09 1105 20:38 20:51 21:10 22:08 22:39





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.5% 30.2 716 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2
Region Championship 100% 5.3 165 0.0 0.2 4.3 28.0 29.9 20.0 11.3 5.0 1.3 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Laura Carleton 53.3% 120.9
Natoya Goule 1.1% 180.2
Dakota Goodman 0.5% 194.0
Charlene Lipsey 0.5% 217.5
Brea Goodman 0.5% 230.5
Leigh-Ann Naccari 0.5% 243.3
Laura Aleman 0.5% 251.0


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Laura Carleton 9.4 0.2 0.8 3.0 5.0 6.1 7.2 8.0 7.8 8.8 8.0 7.9 6.3 6.2 4.6 4.5 3.4 3.0 2.4 1.6 1.5 0.9 0.9 0.5 0.4 0.3
Natoya Goule 25.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.8 0.9 1.7 2.0 2.3 3.2 3.1 3.4 4.3 4.4 4.2 4.4 4.2 5.1
Dakota Goodman 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.6 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.1 2.9 3.4
Charlene Lipsey 41.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.8
Brea Goodman 51.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
Leigh-Ann Naccari 61.5 0.0 0.0
Laura Aleman 109.8




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 0.0% 100.0% 0.0 0.0 1
2 0.2% 100.0% 0.2 0.2 2
3 4.3% 4.7% 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.1 0.2 3
4 28.0% 28.0 4
5 29.9% 29.9 5
6 20.0% 20.0 6
7 11.3% 11.3 7
8 5.0% 5.0 8
9 1.3% 1.3 9
10 0.1% 0.1 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
Total 100% 0.5% 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 99.5 0.3 0.2




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
James Madison 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Texas A&M 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Alabama 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 1.0