Mississippi
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
80  Katie Breathitt SR 19:56
317  Kayleigh Skinner JR 20:38
330  Anne Threlkeld SR 20:39
416  Haley Cutright SO 20:50
558  Kelsey Breathitt SR 21:03
658  Amy McCrory JR 21:10
780  Margaret Harkness SO 21:19
1,532  Tia Leake JR 22:09
2,255  Catie Daigre FR 22:56
2,307  McKenna Coughlin SO 23:00
2,551  Giana Leone SO 23:19
National Rank #53 of 339
South Region Rank #5 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 13.9%
Most Likely Finish 5th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.7%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 95.9%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Katie Breathitt Kayleigh Skinner Anne Threlkeld Haley Cutright Kelsey Breathitt Amy McCrory Margaret Harkness Tia Leake Catie Daigre McKenna Coughlin Giana Leone
Greater Louisville Classic (Gold) 09/29 853 19:52 20:44 20:39 21:05 21:02 21:01 23:30
Alabama Crimson Classic 10/13 1287 21:28 22:09 22:56 22:33 23:19
SEC Championships 10/26 806 20:02 20:35 20:31 20:49 20:59 21:12 21:24
South Region Championships 11/09 816 20:04 20:35 20:50 20:34 21:09 21:19 20:57
NCAA Championship 11/17 19:49





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 13.9% 27.9 639 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.7 0.7 0.7 1.2 1.6 1.6 2.8 3.2
Region Championship 100% 4.4 158 4.5 11.6 29.1 50.7 3.5 0.5 0.1 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Katie Breathitt 88.6% 77.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
Kayleigh Skinner 14.6% 165.3
Anne Threlkeld 14.6% 169.7
Haley Cutright 13.9% 194.7
Kelsey Breathitt 13.9% 218.5
Amy McCrory 13.9% 229.5
Margaret Harkness 13.9% 239.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Katie Breathitt 6.5 1.3 2.8 5.0 8.5 12.8 14.1 11.5 10.2 7.6 6.1 5.0 3.5 2.9 2.2 1.7 1.5 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0
Kayleigh Skinner 28.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.7 0.9 1.3 1.4 1.9 2.4 2.5 3.0 3.3 3.4 3.3 3.9 3.7 4.2
Anne Threlkeld 29.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.4 1.8 1.9 2.3 2.4 2.8 3.3 3.6 3.2 3.0 3.8
Haley Cutright 38.3 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.8 0.7 1.0 1.5 1.5 1.9 2.0
Kelsey Breathitt 52.8 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3
Amy McCrory 61.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1
Margaret Harkness 71.6 0.0 0.0




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 4.5% 100.0% 4.5 4.5 2
3 11.6% 62.7% 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.1 0.7 0.7 0.1 4.3 7.3 3
4 29.1% 5.4% 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 27.6 1.6 4
5 50.7% 1.1% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.4 50.1 0.6 5
6 3.5% 3.5 6
7 0.5% 0.5 7
8 0.1% 0.1 8
9 0.0% 0.0 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 13.9% 4.5 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.5 1.3 0.9 1.1 0.9 86.1 4.5 9.4




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Kentucky 11.2% 1.0 0.1
Georgia 10.8% 1.0 0.1
BYU 2.8% 1.0 0.0
Colorado St. 1.2% 1.0 0.0
LSU 0.3% 1.0 0.0
Texas A&M 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Alabama 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.3
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 3.0