Nevada
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
283  Samantha Diaz JR 20:33
536  Demerey Kirsch SO 21:01
792  Emily Myers FR 21:19
1,198  Erika Root FR 21:47
1,537  Christy Works SR 22:09
1,668  Mariah Gramolini SO 22:18
1,766  Julie Pedersen JR 22:23
2,021  Nicole Painter SR 22:40
2,279  Amber Karnofel JR 22:58
2,490  Caitlin Devitt-Payne SO 23:13
National Rank #115 of 339
Mountain Region Rank #14 of 20
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 13th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 6.1%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Samantha Diaz Demerey Kirsch Emily Myers Erika Root Christy Works Mariah Gramolini Julie Pedersen Nicole Painter Amber Karnofel Caitlin Devitt-Payne
Oregon Dellinger Invitational 09/29 1124 20:36 21:04 21:28 21:47 22:05 21:57 22:30 22:50 23:07
Nevada Chase Relay 10/05 1169 20:52 21:09 21:26 22:13 22:22 22:29 22:41
Chile Pepper Festival 10/13 1072 20:35 20:51 21:02 21:38 22:02 22:22 22:15 23:14
Mountain West Championships 10/26 1091 20:20 21:20 21:16 21:48 22:08 22:16 22:23 22:57 23:19
Mountain Region Championships 11/09 1101 20:35 20:48 21:31 22:01 22:32 22:40 23:11





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 12.8 350 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 1.0 4.8 15.0 21.1 25.2 19.7 9.8 2.6 0.4 0.2



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Samantha Diaz 0.3% 137.0


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Samantha Diaz 29.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.9 1.0 1.7 1.8 2.2 2.5 2.6 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.5 3.5
Demerey Kirsch 55.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2
Emily Myers 69.0
Erika Root 90.9
Christy Works 106.3
Mariah Gramolini 111.9
Julie Pedersen 115.3




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 0.0% 0.0 5
6 0.0% 0.0 6
7 0.0% 0.0 7
8 0.2% 0.2 8
9 1.0% 1.0 9
10 4.8% 4.8 10
11 15.0% 15.0 11
12 21.1% 21.1 12
13 25.2% 25.2 13
14 19.7% 19.7 14
15 9.8% 9.8 15
16 2.6% 2.6 16
17 0.4% 0.4 17
18 0.2% 0.2 18
19 19
20 20
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0