New Mexico
Men
-
Women
2011
-
2012 -
2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
42 |
Josephine Moultrie |
SR |
19:40 |
83 |
Charlotte Arter |
JR |
19:57 |
106 |
Lacey Oeding |
SR |
20:03 |
282 |
Shawna Winnegar |
SR |
20:33 |
346 |
Kirsten Follett |
SO |
20:42 |
370 |
Imogen Ainsworth |
SR |
20:45 |
548 |
Chloe Anderson |
JR |
21:02 |
837 |
Janna Mitsos |
JR |
21:22 |
953 |
Sophia Torres |
SO |
21:30 |
1,025 |
Samantha Shepard |
SO |
21:36 |
|
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
1.2% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
10.3% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
61.8% |
Regional Champion |
24.6% |
Top 5 in Regional |
99.6% |
Top 10 in Regional |
100.0% |
Top 20 in Regional |
100.0% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Josephine Moultrie |
Charlotte Arter |
Lacey Oeding |
Shawna Winnegar |
Kirsten Follett |
Imogen Ainsworth |
Chloe Anderson |
Janna Mitsos |
Sophia Torres |
Samantha Shepard |
Notre Dame Invitational (Blue) |
09/28 |
657 |
19:50 |
20:23 |
20:22 |
20:40 |
20:34 |
20:53 |
21:03 |
21:31 |
21:30 |
|
Wisconsin adidas Invitational |
10/12 |
559 |
19:30 |
19:58 |
20:09 |
20:41 |
20:46 |
20:47 |
21:13 |
|
|
|
Mountain West Championships |
10/26 |
616 |
20:15 |
20:02 |
20:00 |
20:40 |
20:53 |
20:41 |
20:43 |
20:50 |
|
21:36 |
Mountain Region Championships |
11/09 |
489 |
19:30 |
19:58 |
20:11 |
20:16 |
20:38 |
20:51 |
|
21:40 |
|
|
NCAA Championship |
11/17 |
416 |
19:32 |
19:44 |
19:50 |
20:20 |
20:38 |
20:33 |
21:06 |
|
|
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
98.1% |
18.3 |
460 |
|
|
0.1 |
0.4 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
1.5 |
1.9 |
2.3 |
2.7 |
3.7 |
4.7 |
4.4 |
5.1 |
5.8 |
5.6 |
5.7 |
5.7 |
6.1 |
4.7 |
4.9 |
5.1 |
4.7 |
4.3 |
3.3 |
3.6 |
3.3 |
2.4 |
2.1 |
1.7 |
0.8 |
Region Championship |
100% |
2.2 |
94 |
24.6 |
38.5 |
27.8 |
7.0 |
1.6 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Josephine Moultrie |
99.6% |
43.8 |
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
0.6 |
0.8 |
0.9 |
1.3 |
1.0 |
1.3 |
1.2 |
1.0 |
1.3 |
1.7 |
1.4 |
1.5 |
Charlotte Arter |
98.1% |
81.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
Lacey Oeding |
98.1% |
98.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
Shawna Winnegar |
98.1% |
178.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kirsten Follett |
98.1% |
198.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Imogen Ainsworth |
98.1% |
205.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chloe Anderson |
98.1% |
232.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Josephine Moultrie |
4.9 |
2.5 |
8.1 |
11.0 |
14.4 |
16.3 |
14.2 |
11.4 |
8.2 |
5.5 |
3.5 |
2.3 |
0.9 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
Charlotte Arter |
9.2 |
0.1 |
0.4 |
1.2 |
2.6 |
4.5 |
6.0 |
9.7 |
11.6 |
11.5 |
10.4 |
9.5 |
7.5 |
5.9 |
4.5 |
3.3 |
2.7 |
1.9 |
1.6 |
1.1 |
1.0 |
0.7 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.1 |
Lacey Oeding |
11.4 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.7 |
1.8 |
3.1 |
5.2 |
6.5 |
8.4 |
10.1 |
9.5 |
9.7 |
8.5 |
7.2 |
4.8 |
4.7 |
4.0 |
2.7 |
2.2 |
1.9 |
1.9 |
1.3 |
0.9 |
1.1 |
0.5 |
Shawna Winnegar |
29.3 |
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
1.5 |
2.1 |
1.6 |
2.4 |
2.3 |
2.7 |
2.8 |
3.1 |
3.4 |
3.6 |
3.9 |
3.5 |
Kirsten Follett |
37.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
1.0 |
1.3 |
1.0 |
1.2 |
1.3 |
2.0 |
2.1 |
2.0 |
Imogen Ainsworth |
40.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.4 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
0.9 |
1.2 |
1.3 |
1.2 |
1.4 |
Chloe Anderson |
56.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
24.6% |
100.0% |
24.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.6 |
|
1 |
2 |
38.5% |
100.0% |
|
38.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.5 |
|
2 |
3 |
27.8% |
100.0% |
| |
0.1 |
0.5 |
2.4 |
6.8 |
7.8 |
5.5 |
3.1 |
1.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
27.8 |
3 |
4 |
7.0% |
98.9% |
| |
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.6 |
1.4 |
1.9 |
1.3 |
0.7 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
6.9 |
4 |
5 |
1.6% |
12.5% |
| |
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
0.1 |
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
|
|
1.4 |
|
0.2 |
5 |
6 |
0.4% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
6 |
7 |
0.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
7 |
8 |
0.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
8 |
9 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
10 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
11 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
12 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
13 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
Total |
100% |
98.1% |
24.6 |
38.5 |
0.1 |
0.5 |
2.5 |
7.4 |
9.2 |
7.4 |
4.4 |
2.1 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
1.9 |
63.1 |
35.0 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
Minnesota |
98.0% |
1.0 |
1.0 |
Connecticut |
97.5% |
1.0 |
1.0 |
Notre Dame |
95.3% |
1.0 |
1.0 |
Vanderbilt |
87.8% |
1.0 |
0.9 |
Toledo |
71.9% |
1.0 |
0.7 |
Boston College |
68.1% |
1.0 |
0.7 |
North Carolina St. |
53.9% |
2.0 |
1.1 |
UCLA |
39.1% |
1.0 |
0.4 |
San Francisco |
27.7% |
1.0 |
0.3 |
Yale |
24.0% |
1.0 |
0.2 |
SMU |
23.6% |
1.0 |
0.2 |
Princeton |
14.9% |
2.0 |
0.3 |
Wisconsin |
12.8% |
1.0 |
0.1 |
Georgia |
10.8% |
1.0 |
0.1 |
Northwestern |
7.9% |
2.0 |
0.2 |
Dartmouth |
7.5% |
1.0 |
0.1 |
Syracuse |
3.7% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
North Carolina |
2.9% |
2.0 |
0.1 |
BYU |
2.8% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Harvard |
2.0% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Colorado St. |
1.2% |
2.0 |
0.0 |
Illinois |
0.7% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Brown |
0.5% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Tulsa |
0.5% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Ohio State |
0.4% |
2.0 |
0.0 |
Indiana |
0.2% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Iowa |
0.1% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Columbia |
0.1% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Virginia |
0.1% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Texas A&M |
0.1% |
2.0 |
0.0 |
Northern Arizona |
0.0% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Alabama |
0.0% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Air Force |
0.0% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Ohio U. |
0.0% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Cal Poly |
0.0% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Boise State |
0.0% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
|
Total |
|
|
8.4 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
3.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
16.0 |