Oklahoma State
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
46  Monika Juodeskaite SO 19:41
58  Natalja Piliusina JR 19:48
291  Jacqueline Campos SR 20:34
301  Kate Kujawa JR 20:36
357  Samantha Nightingale FR 20:43
439  Victoria Hanna SO 20:52
441  Caileigh Glenn JR 20:52
808  Savannah Camacho FR 21:20
904  Taylor Light SO 21:27
1,101  Monica Lake FR 21:41
1,251  Jenny Dyer JR 21:50
3,447  Paige Barnes FR 25:16
3,697  Alex Ervin FR 26:48
National Rank #25 of 339
Midwest Region Rank #3 of 35
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 49.2%
Most Likely Finish 3rd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 1.4%
Top 20 at Nationals 20.8%


Regional Champion 0.6%
Top 5 in Regional 98.2%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Monika Juodeskaite Natalja Piliusina Jacqueline Campos Kate Kujawa Samantha Nightingale Victoria Hanna Caileigh Glenn Savannah Camacho Taylor Light Monica Lake Jenny Dyer
Cowboy Jamboree 09/29 737 19:44 20:40 20:31 20:43 20:43 20:53 21:16 21:06 21:29
Chile Pepper Festival 10/13 763 19:46 20:28 20:22 21:07 20:59 21:21 21:34 21:56 21:47
Big 12 Championships 10/27 652 19:30 19:47 20:46 20:46 20:50 21:03 21:25 21:19 21:40 21:55
Midwest Region Championships 11/09 566 19:49 19:58 20:22 20:26 20:36 21:30
NCAA Championship 11/17 678 19:38 19:43 20:54 20:51 20:48 21:54





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 49.2% 21.3 506 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.8 0.9 1.4 1.8 1.9 2.2 2.3 2.5 2.4 3.0 3.1 3.5 3.2 2.8 3.4 2.8 2.6 2.2 2.1 1.4 1.1
Region Championship 100% 3.1 121 0.6 25.8 48.5 18.7 4.5 1.3 0.3 0.1 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Monika Juodeskaite 79.3% 44.8 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.9 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 0.8 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.2
Natalja Piliusina 67.4% 59.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.6
Jacqueline Campos 49.2% 172.4
Kate Kujawa 49.2% 175.1
Victoria Hanna 49.2% 211.5
Caileigh Glenn 49.2% 211.2
Savannah Camacho 49.2% 244.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Monika Juodeskaite 5.8 0.2 0.9 2.8 9.6 19.7 20.8 15.1 10.2 7.2 4.7 3.1 2.0 1.2 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
Natalja Piliusina 7.3 0.0 0.1 0.7 3.7 9.2 15.0 17.3 13.8 10.5 8.1 5.9 4.7 3.1 2.2 1.7 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1
Jacqueline Campos 28.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.7 1.1 1.5 2.0 2.8 2.1 2.8 3.6 3.9 3.8 3.6 4.4
Kate Kujawa 30.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.8 0.9 1.2 1.9 2.0 2.3 2.5 2.7 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.5
Victoria Hanna 46.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.0
Caileigh Glenn 46.9 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7
Savannah Camacho 88.3 0.0




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 0.6% 100.0% 0.6 0.6 1
2 25.8% 100.0% 25.8 25.8 2
3 48.5% 40.4% 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.4 2.1 2.5 2.8 2.5 5.0 28.9 19.6 3
4 18.7% 16.7% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.7 15.6 3.1 4
5 4.5% 0.4% 0.0 4.5 0.0 5
6 1.3% 1.3 6
7 0.3% 0.3 7
8 0.1% 0.1 8
9 0.0% 0.0 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
Total 100% 49.2% 0.6 25.8 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.8 0.8 1.1 1.6 2.4 2.9 3.5 3.3 5.8 50.8 26.5 22.7




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Texas 94.9% 1.0 0.9
SMU 23.6% 1.0 0.2
Baylor 0.5% 1.0 0.0
LSU 0.3% 1.0 0.0
West Virginia 0.2% 1.0 0.0
James Madison 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Total 1.2
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 3.0