UC Santa Barbara
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
204  Daniella Moreno SO 20:23
440  Cassie Brooker SR 20:52
508  Christine Cooperstein SO 20:58
684  Ariana Selix SR 21:12
963  Sarah Shreck FR 21:31
1,140  Bailey Miller SO 21:43
1,178  Jessica Chadwick JR 21:46
1,243  Courtney Lightfoot SR 21:50
1,617  Maxine Goyette FR 22:14
1,701  Ali Palmer FR 22:19
3,191  Jennifer Carey 24:27
3,351  Cherrie Mcmillian 24:56
3,445  Camille Petty 25:16
3,714  Katherine Lee 27:01
3,715  Cassandra Centofranchi 27:01
3,725  Tori Usgaard 27:05
3,824  Shannon Trumbull 29:05
3,826  Cherise Dixon 29:16
3,866  Brittany Fulton 32:09
3,877  Madison Keyser 32:58
National Rank #85 of 339
West Region Rank #15 of 39
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 15th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 3.9%
Top 20 in Regional 99.9%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Daniella Moreno Cassie Brooker Christine Cooperstein Ariana Selix Sarah Shreck Bailey Miller Jessica Chadwick Courtney Lightfoot Maxine Goyette Ali Palmer Jennifer Carey
Stanford Invitational 09/29 968 20:17 20:36 21:11 20:57 21:39 21:44 21:36 21:59 22:08 22:26
Pre-Nationals Meet (Red) 10/13 971 20:28 20:36 20:43 21:16 21:34 21:27 21:53
CSUN Invitational 10/13 22:08 22:11
Titan Invitational 10/19 1748 24:28
Big West Championships 10/27 1025 20:25 20:58 21:01 21:12 21:14 21:51 21:59 21:27 22:27
West Region Championships 11/09 1062 20:21 21:29 21:00 21:21 21:39 22:04 21:56





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 14.6 423 0.0 0.3 1.3 2.3 4.4 7.6 11.7 17.9 19.7 18.9 9.1 4.2 1.8 0.7 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Daniella Moreno 0.9% 118.0


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Daniella Moreno 38.4 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.5 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.4
Cassie Brooker 70.7
Christine Cooperstein 80.0
Ariana Selix 102.0
Sarah Shreck 130.6
Bailey Miller 143.7
Jessica Chadwick 146.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 0.0% 0.0 7
8 0.3% 0.3 8
9 1.3% 1.3 9
10 2.3% 2.3 10
11 4.4% 4.4 11
12 7.6% 7.6 12
13 11.7% 11.7 13
14 17.9% 17.9 14
15 19.7% 19.7 15
16 18.9% 18.9 16
17 9.1% 9.1 17
18 4.2% 4.2 18
19 1.8% 1.8 19
20 0.7% 0.7 20
21 0.1% 0.1 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Baylor 0.5% 1.0 0.0
Ohio U. 0.0% 1.0 0.0
North Dakota St. 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 1.0