USC Upstate
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
41  Jemeli Sang SR 19:39
903  Joan Tangwar SR 21:27
1,760  Jasmine Polite SO 22:23
2,339  Anastasia Kolesnitchenko FR 23:02
2,475  Hannah Chaney JR 23:13
2,856  Laura Transue SR 23:44
2,891  Erin Gethin SO 23:49
3,007  Ashleigh Torres FR 24:01
3,116  Molly Bliss FR 24:17
3,145  Nia Payne FR 24:21
3,272  Sarah Boyd SO 24:42
3,414  Danielle Horneff FR 25:09
National Rank #100 of 339
Southeast Region Rank #13 of 49
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 27th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.8%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Jemeli Sang Joan Tangwar Jasmine Polite Anastasia Kolesnitchenko Hannah Chaney Laura Transue Erin Gethin Ashleigh Torres Molly Bliss Nia Payne Sarah Boyd
Lehigh's Paul Short Run (Gold) 09/28 1388 22:05 23:20 23:06 24:04 23:50 23:56 23:57 25:38 24:54
Charlotte Invitational (Gold) 09/28 19:45 21:26
Atlantic Sun Championships 10/27 1383 22:24 22:54 23:30 23:46 23:50 24:07 24:39 24:00 24:33
Southeast Region Championships 11/09 1368 22:44 22:58 23:07 23:25 23:47 24:01 24:13





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 26.5 751 0.0 0.2 0.6 1.5 3.9 6.4 9.4 12.3 14.4 16.5 13.8 10.2 5.7 3.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Jemeli Sang 96.0% 42.7 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.9 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.7 1.5 1.4


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Jemeli Sang 5.6 3.6 7.8 9.6 10.3 11.2 11.6 10.9 10.6 7.4 6.0 4.6 2.3 1.4 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Joan Tangwar 90.7
Jasmine Polite 182.0
Anastasia Kolesnitchenko 229.2
Hannah Chaney 240.4
Laura Transue 268.0
Erin Gethin 271.4




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 0.0% 0.0 18
19 0.2% 0.2 19
20 0.6% 0.6 20
21 1.5% 1.5 21
22 3.9% 3.9 22
23 6.4% 6.4 23
24 9.4% 9.4 24
25 12.3% 12.3 25
26 14.4% 14.4 26
27 16.5% 16.5 27
28 13.8% 13.8 28
29 10.2% 10.2 29
30 5.7% 5.7 30
31 3.0% 3.0 31
32 1.4% 1.4 32
33 0.4% 0.4 33
34 0.1% 0.1 34
35 0.0% 0.0 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0