USC
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
519  Erica Capellino SO 21:00
521  Shelby Buckley SR 21:00
725  Jenna Tong FR 21:15
1,136  Katerina Berdousi FR 21:43
1,156  Nicole Davies FR 21:44
1,609  Natasha Strickland FR 22:14
1,769  Erin Robinson SO 22:23
1,834  Erin Matranga SO 22:27
1,862  Kira Soderstrom SO 22:28
2,102  Katie DeYoung SO 22:46
2,156  Shannon Byrne SO 22:49
2,280  Kelly Owen SR 22:58
3,372  Francesca Adamski JR 25:01
3,600  Anna Burger JR 26:04
National Rank #131 of 339
West Region Rank #20 of 39
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 19th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 85.6%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Erica Capellino Shelby Buckley Jenna Tong Katerina Berdousi Nicole Davies Natasha Strickland Erin Robinson Erin Matranga Kira Soderstrom Katie DeYoung Shannon Byrne
Stanford Invitational 09/29 1138 20:53 20:59 21:28 21:35 21:30 22:01 22:50
Highlander Invitational 10/13 1164 21:02 21:08 21:16 22:35 21:32 21:51 22:22 22:29 22:12 22:46 22:42
Titan Invitational 10/19 1374 22:27 22:46 22:57
Pac-12 Championships 10/27 1147 21:04 20:54 21:04 21:27 22:54 22:52 23:01





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 18.7 564 0.1 0.3 0.7 2.7 6.4 15.6 18.7 21.8 19.3 9.0 3.7 1.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Erica Capellino 82.0
Shelby Buckley 82.2
Jenna Tong 107.0
Katerina Berdousi 143.5
Nicole Davies 145.4
Natasha Strickland 179.2
Erin Robinson 191.0




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 0.1% 0.1 12
13 0.3% 0.3 13
14 0.7% 0.7 14
15 2.7% 2.7 15
16 6.4% 6.4 16
17 15.6% 15.6 17
18 18.7% 18.7 18
19 21.8% 21.8 19
20 19.3% 19.3 20
21 9.0% 9.0 21
22 3.7% 3.7 22
23 1.1% 1.1 23
24 0.3% 0.3 24
25 0.2% 0.2 25
26 0.1% 0.1 26
27 0.0% 0.0 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0