UTSA
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
406  Alyssa Diaz JR 20:48
437  Nina Herrera JR 20:52
841  Emily Perez FR 21:23
864  Samantha Fish JR 21:24
1,384  Carly Kitts SO 21:59
1,498  Jessica Bitterly JR 22:08
1,639  Isabel Balbontin JR 22:16
2,370  Sarah Wedgeworth JR 23:04
3,183  Courtney Haass JR 24:26
3,730  Courtney Johnson JR 27:09
National Rank #118 of 339
South Central Region Rank #10 of 34
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 9th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 3.1%
Top 10 in Regional 97.8%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Alyssa Diaz Nina Herrera Emily Perez Samantha Fish Carly Kitts Jessica Bitterly Isabel Balbontin Sarah Wedgeworth Courtney Haass Courtney Johnson
Grass Routes Run Festival 09/29 1173 20:59 21:40 21:11 21:30 21:54 22:28 22:05 23:18 23:51
Chile Pepper Festival 10/13 1080 20:41 20:46 21:20 21:25 21:48 22:12 21:56 22:53 25:04 27:09
WAC Championships 10/27 21:23
South Central Region Championships 11/09 1083 20:50 20:33 21:48 21:17 22:27 21:43 23:21





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 8.2 237 0.1 0.9 2.2 6.7 14.0 30.9 35.3 7.8 2.1 0.1 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Alyssa Diaz 1.0% 173.7
Nina Herrera 0.7% 166.3


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Alyssa Diaz 25.6 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.5 1.1 1.2 1.9 1.9 2.4 3.1 3.6 3.6 4.1 4.0 4.1 5.3 4.8 4.3
Nina Herrera 27.8 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.6 0.6 1.1 1.6 1.4 1.8 2.3 3.0 3.3 4.0 3.9 4.1 4.2 4.0
Emily Perez 51.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1
Samantha Fish 52.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
Carly Kitts 77.8
Jessica Bitterly 85.7
Isabel Balbontin 93.9




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 0.1% 0.1 3
4 0.9% 0.9 4
5 2.2% 2.2 5
6 6.7% 6.7 6
7 14.0% 14.0 7
8 30.9% 30.9 8
9 35.3% 35.3 9
10 7.8% 7.8 10
11 2.1% 2.1 11
12 0.1% 0.1 12
13 0.0% 0.0 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0