Utah
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
21  Amanda Mergaert SR 19:30
191  Susannah Hurst SO 20:21
203  Giselle Slotboom SO 20:22
818  Andrea Chavez FR 21:21
1,133  Nikki Rietz SO 21:43
1,151  Kate Stringfellow SO 21:44
1,680  Charlotte Kuzminsky FR 22:18
1,782  Lauren Mills SO 22:24
2,215  Megan Combe SR 22:53
2,492  Hillary Troutner JR 23:13
National Rank #44 of 339
Mountain Region Rank #4 of 20
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.2%
Most Likely Finish 7th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 17.1%
Top 10 in Regional 99.8%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Amanda Mergaert Susannah Hurst Giselle Slotboom Andrea Chavez Nikki Rietz Kate Stringfellow Charlotte Kuzminsky Lauren Mills Megan Combe Hillary Troutner
Stanford Invitational 09/29 833 19:36 20:25 20:43 21:13 22:30 21:51 22:11 22:21 23:03 23:22
Pre-Nationals Meet (Red) 10/13 761 19:35 20:24 20:14 21:21 21:46 21:42 22:08
Pre-Nationals Meet (Black) 10/13 22:29 22:44 23:23
Pac-12 Championships 10/27 780 19:30 20:13 20:37 21:18 21:35 21:38 22:54 22:26 22:54 22:49
Mountain Region Championships 11/09 721 19:24 20:26 20:01 21:42 21:21 21:49 22:21
NCAA Championship 11/17 19:19





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.2% 24.2 553 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Region Championship 100% 6.8 203 0.5 3.7 12.9 23.7 27.7 19.0 9.3 3.0 0.2 0.0 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Amanda Mergaert 100% 26.3 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.2 1.0 1.8 2.1 1.7 2.2 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.2 3.0 2.2 2.2 2.9 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.3 2.0
Susannah Hurst 2.8% 105.8
Giselle Slotboom 2.0% 121.5
Andrea Chavez 0.2% 233.5
Nikki Rietz 0.2% 248.8
Kate Stringfellow 0.2% 246.5
Charlotte Kuzminsky 0.2% 251.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Amanda Mergaert 3.0 11.9 19.2 19.7 16.2 12.0 7.8 5.6 2.9 2.1 1.3 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Susannah Hurst 20.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.8 1.3 1.7 2.8 3.7 3.9 5.5 4.9 5.1 4.9 5.1 4.6 4.7 4.7 4.5 3.8 3.7 3.5
Giselle Slotboom 20.8 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 1.1 1.8 2.1 2.9 3.6 4.2 4.7 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.0 4.1 4.3 4.2 4.3 3.6 3.7
Andrea Chavez 70.8
Nikki Rietz 87.4
Kate Stringfellow 88.1
Charlotte Kuzminsky 112.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 0.5% 33.3% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.2 3
4 3.7% 0.5% 0.0 3.7 0.0 4
5 12.9% 0.3% 0.0 12.8 0.0 5
6 23.7% 23.7 6
7 27.7% 27.7 7
8 19.0% 19.0 8
9 9.3% 9.3 9
10 3.0% 3.0 10
11 0.2% 0.2 11
12 0.0% 0.0 12
13 0.0% 0.0 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
Total 100% 0.2% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 99.8 0.0 0.2




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Illinois 0.7% 1.0 0.0
Tulsa 0.5% 1.0 0.0
Baylor 0.5% 1.0 0.0
Clemson 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Ohio U. 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Air Force 0.0% 1.0 0.0
North Dakota St. 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 2.0