Eastern Washington
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
755  Berenice Penaloza SO 21:17
847  Sarah Reiter FR 21:23
1,191  Katie Mahoney SO 21:45
1,278  Paula Gil Echevarria FR 21:50
1,534  Caite Arrigoni JR 22:06
2,030  Mayra Chavez SO 22:38
2,292  Keeley Davidson FR 22:55
3,021  Katie Lynch FR 23:54
National Rank #179 of 340
West Region Rank #26 of 39
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 23rd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 10.5%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Berenice Penaloza Sarah Reiter Katie Mahoney Paula Gil Echevarria Caite Arrigoni Mayra Chavez Keeley Davidson Katie Lynch
Notre Dame Invitational (Gold) 10/04 1224 21:31 21:25 21:39 22:11 22:03
Big Sky Championships 11/01 1216 21:22 21:47 21:44 21:25 21:59 22:38 23:29 23:22
West Region Championships 11/15 1160 20:52 20:57 21:56 21:56 22:20 22:27 24:38





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 23.6 701 0.1 0.3 0.7 2.1 7.4 12.9 13.8 14.1 13.6 11.1 8.9 6.6 4.1 2.9 1.2 0.2



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Berenice Penaloza 107.0
Sarah Reiter 116.5
Katie Mahoney 147.3
Paula Gil Echevarria 154.9
Caite Arrigoni 174.9
Mayra Chavez 209.6
Keeley Davidson 224.2




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 0.1% 0.1 16
17 0.3% 0.3 17
18 0.7% 0.7 18
19 2.1% 2.1 19
20 7.4% 7.4 20
21 12.9% 12.9 21
22 13.8% 13.8 22
23 14.1% 14.1 23
24 13.6% 13.6 24
25 11.1% 11.1 25
26 8.9% 8.9 26
27 6.6% 6.6 27
28 4.1% 4.1 28
29 2.9% 2.9 29
30 1.2% 1.2 30
31 0.2% 0.2 31
32 0.0% 0.0 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0