Baylor
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
121  Rachel Johnson JR 20:08
325  Maggie Montoya FR 20:40
480  Alex Davis FR 20:55
716  Erin Hegarty SO 21:14
779  Mariah Kelly JR 21:18
1,003  Peyton Thomas FR 21:34
1,251  Bree Schrader JR 21:49
1,307  Erika Overbeck JR 21:53
1,413  Sarah Guhl SO 21:59
1,553  Sofia Pitouli FR 22:07
1,666  Lindsey Smith FR 22:14
1,708  Lauren Hierholzer JR 22:17
2,253  Kristina Brown SR 22:52
2,284  Jenna Henrich JR 22:54
2,406  Gretta Smith SO 23:03
2,423  Angela Tharpe SO 23:04
2,522  Kimberly Walbeck FR 23:08
2,572  Alexis Reamer FR 23:11
2,593  Courtney Cox JR 23:13
3,134  Meredith Jackson SO 24:09
3,231  Jessica Purtell FR 24:24
3,279  Lauren Stevens JR 24:31
3,382  Annie Jaska FR 24:50
3,515  Catherine Zabilski SO 25:25
National Rank #74 of 340
South Central Region Rank #7 of 36
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 4.0%
Most Likely Finish 6th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.1%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 53.4%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Rachel Johnson Maggie Montoya Alex Davis Erin Hegarty Mariah Kelly Peyton Thomas Bree Schrader Erika Overbeck Sarah Guhl Sofia Pitouli Lindsey Smith
Ken Garland Invitational 09/28 1260 21:48 21:45 22:04
Notre Dame Invitational (Blue) 10/04 941 20:06 20:33 21:17 20:56 21:47 21:41 22:34 21:59 22:26
Chile Pepper Festival 10/05 1307
HBU Invitational 10/11 1258 21:42 22:07 21:45
Pre-National Invitational (Blue) 10/19 969 20:15 20:39 20:57 21:11 22:14 21:36 21:49
Big 12 Championships 11/02 952 20:18 20:46 20:50 21:08 21:06 21:22 21:59 21:47 22:20 22:54
South Central Region Championships 11/15 873 19:45 20:47 20:38 22:20 21:02 21:55
NCAA Championship 11/23 20:11





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 4.0% 28.7 712 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.6 0.6 0.8 1.1
Region Championship 100% 5.3 163 3.8 9.4 17.2 23.0 24.5 17.5 3.5 0.8 0.2 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Rachel Johnson 44.7% 94.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Maggie Montoya 4.1% 154.8
Alex Davis 4.0% 191.3
Erin Hegarty 4.0% 226.0
Mariah Kelly 4.0% 233.0
Peyton Thomas 4.0% 245.3
Bree Schrader 4.0% 249.8


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Rachel Johnson 9.5 0.1 0.4 1.2 2.2 4.9 7.2 8.9 9.9 10.9 9.3 8.8 7.1 6.4 5.1 4.5 3.2 2.6 2.2 1.5 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.3
Maggie Montoya 24.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.7 0.8 1.4 1.6 2.3 2.7 3.6 3.5 4.7 4.2 5.2 4.9 5.3 5.1 4.7
Alex Davis 33.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.5 1.2 1.0 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.4 2.6
Erin Hegarty 44.6 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Mariah Kelly 47.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1
Peyton Thomas 60.3
Bree Schrader 73.5




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 3.8% 100.0% 3.8 3.8 2
3 9.4% 1.3% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.2 0.1 3
4 17.2% 17.2 4
5 23.0% 23.0 5
6 24.5% 24.5 6
7 17.5% 17.5 7
8 3.5% 3.5 8
9 0.8% 0.8 9
10 0.2% 0.2 10
11 0.0% 0.0 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
Total 100% 4.0% 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 96.0 3.8 0.1




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
UTSA 2.6% 1.0 0.0
Tulsa 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Eastern Kentucky 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Kansas 0.0% 2.0 0.0
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 2.0