Bradley
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
186  Sarah McMahon JR 20:20
282  Kristen Busch SO 20:34
510  Emily Delvo JR 20:58
932  Caitlin Busch SO 21:29
988  Casey Kramer FR 21:33
1,044  Lauren Houmes SO 21:36
1,234  Liz Smits SO 21:48
1,364  Rachel Sudbury SO 21:57
1,557  Caitlin Pribble SO 22:08
1,623  Katie Wampole FR 22:12
1,782  Lauren Cunningham FR 22:21
1,945  Kyela Specht JR 22:31
2,095  Nicole Lopez-Villegas FR 22:41
2,112  Mackenzie Griffin FR 22:43
2,125  Whitney Schumacher SR 22:44
2,258  Emily Gustafson SR 22:52
2,602  Megan Price FR 23:14
2,736  Kylie McKinney SO 23:26
2,839  Ashley Schmitt JR 23:35
3,281  Rebecca Gosselin FR 24:31
3,339  Emily Wolbers SR 24:42
3,775  Melody Mercado FR 27:26
National Rank #81 of 340
Midwest Region Rank #8 of 36
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 9th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 11.4%
Top 10 in Regional 60.4%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Sarah McMahon Kristen Busch Emily Delvo Caitlin Busch Casey Kramer Lauren Houmes Liz Smits Rachel Sudbury Caitlin Pribble Katie Wampole Lauren Cunningham
Notre Dame Invitational (Blue) 10/04 887 20:13 20:30 20:47 20:58 21:50 21:37 21:05 23:04
John Flamer Invite 10/05 1388
Bradley Classic 10/18 1075 20:39 20:46 21:10 21:39 21:34 22:09 21:46 22:07 22:21 22:31
Illini Open 10/25 1275 22:08 22:17
Missouri Valley Championships 11/02 956 20:18 20:39 20:45 22:06 21:21 21:32 22:35 21:47
Midwest Region Championships 11/15 947 20:18 20:21 21:15 21:18 21:32 21:19 21:54





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 9.5 296 1.9 3.7 5.8 7.4 8.9 10.5 11.2 11.0 10.6 10.8 8.7 6.0 2.4 0.9 0.2 0.1 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Sarah McMahon 4.9% 107.0
Kristen Busch 0.3% 140.0


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Sarah McMahon 17.7 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.8 1.2 1.4 1.9 2.0 3.1 3.5 3.9 3.9 4.4 4.4 5.1 5.0 5.4 5.4 5.2 4.4 4.6 4.0 3.6 3.6 2.9
Kristen Busch 27.3 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.7 1.9 2.4 2.5 3.3 3.0 3.4 3.6 3.5 4.4 4.3
Emily Delvo 51.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.5
Caitlin Busch 98.6
Casey Kramer 105.0
Lauren Houmes 109.0
Liz Smits 125.7




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 1.9% 1.9 3
4 3.7% 3.7 4
5 5.8% 5.8 5
6 7.4% 7.4 6
7 8.9% 8.9 7
8 10.5% 10.5 8
9 11.2% 11.2 9
10 11.0% 11.0 10
11 10.6% 10.6 11
12 10.8% 10.8 12
13 8.7% 8.7 13
14 6.0% 6.0 14
15 2.4% 2.4 15
16 0.9% 0.9 16
17 0.2% 0.2 17
18 0.1% 0.1 18
19 0.0% 0.0 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
SMU 33.5% 1.0 0.3
Baylor 3.8% 1.0 0.0
UTSA 2.6% 1.0 0.0
Lamar 1.2% 1.0 0.0
Lipscomb 0.7% 1.0 0.0
Ohio State 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Northwestern 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.4
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 3.0