Bryant
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
126  Eimear Black 20:09
1,112  Martha Reynolds 21:40
1,326  Annmarie Tuxbury 21:54
2,142  Emily Mcneil 22:45
2,305  Kara Walsh 22:56
2,374  Staci Rezendes 23:00
2,394  Erin Svensen 23:02
2,417  Brooke Tomasetti JR 23:04
2,471  Eimear Black SR 23:07
2,475  Martha Reynolds JR 23:07
2,476  Annmarie Tuxbury SO 23:07
2,480  Staci Rezendes SO 23:07
2,481  Kara Walsh JR 23:07
2,483  Erin Svensen SO 23:07
2,490  Brittany Sarza SO 23:07
2,503  Emily McNeil FR 23:07
2,504  Lauren Ganim JR 23:07
3,020  Brittany Sarza 23:54
3,272  Lauren Ganim 24:30
National Rank #125 of 340
Northeast Region Rank #17 of 42
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 23rd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 14.2%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Eimear Black Martha Reynolds Annmarie Tuxbury Emily Mcneil Kara Walsh Staci Rezendes Erin Svensen Brooke Tomasetti Eimear Black Martha Reynolds Annmarie Tuxbury
Father Bede Invitational 09/28 1132 20:16 21:34 21:45 23:12 23:09 22:58 22:45 20:16 21:34 21:45
NEICAAA New England Championship 10/12 1125 20:14 21:54 21:59 22:43 22:42 22:59 20:14 21:54 21:59
CCSU Mini Meet 10/25 1182 20:38 21:39 22:31 22:46 22:34 23:22 22:59 20:38 21:39 22:31
NEC Championships 11/02 1010 19:27 21:08 21:47 22:30 22:54 23:07 23:11 19:27 21:08 21:47
Northeast Region Championships 11/15 1125 20:11 22:03 21:45 22:37 23:31 23:05 23:20 20:11 22:03 21:45





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 22.7 678 0.3 1.6 4.0 8.3 13.4 17.4 20.3 16.4 10.3 4.9 2.3 0.7 0.1 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Eimear Black 12.8% 88.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Eimear Black 20.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.8 1.3 1.6 2.2 3.0 3.7 5.0 4.6 5.2 5.0 5.2 5.0 5.2 5.1 5.3 4.7 4.2 4.0
Martha Reynolds 117.1
Annmarie Tuxbury 137.3
Emily Mcneil 197.0
Kara Walsh 209.3
Staci Rezendes 214.9
Erin Svensen 217.2




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 0.3% 0.3 17
18 1.6% 1.6 18
19 4.0% 4.0 19
20 8.3% 8.3 20
21 13.4% 13.4 21
22 17.4% 17.4 22
23 20.3% 20.3 23
24 16.4% 16.4 24
25 10.3% 10.3 25
26 4.9% 4.9 26
27 2.3% 2.3 27
28 0.7% 0.7 28
29 0.1% 0.1 29
30 0.1% 0.1 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0