Dartmouth
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1  Abbey D'Agostino SR 18:51
51  Dana Giordano SO 19:46
86  Sarah Delozier JR 20:00
192  Elizabeth Markowitz SO 20:21
221  Alison Lanois JR 20:25
320  Hannah Rowe SR 20:40
439  Sarah Bennett SO 20:51
598  Bridget End SR 21:06
1,123  Helen Schlachtenhaufen FR 21:41
1,142  Claudia Pham JR 21:42
1,243  Arianna Vailas SR 21:48
1,252  Erin McConnell FR 21:49
1,489  Ashley Ulrich JR 22:03
1,877  Reid Watson SO 22:27
1,917  Margaret Donovan JR 22:29
1,975  Jennifer Cunningham FR 22:33
National Rank #13 of 340
Northeast Region Rank #2 of 42
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 99.9%
Most Likely Finish 14th at Nationals


National Champion 0.6%
Top 5 at Nationals 11.9%
Top 10 at Nationals 40.4%
Top 20 at Nationals 95.6%


Regional Champion 6.2%
Top 5 in Regional 99.9%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Abbey D'Agostino Dana Giordano Sarah Delozier Elizabeth Markowitz Alison Lanois Hannah Rowe Sarah Bennett Bridget End Helen Schlachtenhaufen Claudia Pham Arianna Vailas
Lehigh's Paul Short Run (Gold) 10/05 484 18:58 19:50 20:12 20:29 20:36 20:37 20:58 21:44 21:40
NEICAAA New England Championship 10/12 1243 21:40 21:50 22:17
Brown University Rothernberg Invitational 10/18 1122 20:28 21:30 21:54 21:36
Wisconsin adidas Invitational 10/19 401 18:57 19:47 19:56 20:20 20:30 21:17 21:06
Ivy League Championships 11/02 329 18:55 19:42 19:46 20:20 20:13 20:43 20:45 21:12 21:51 21:12 21:51
Northeast Region Championships 11/15 403 19:08 20:02 19:54 20:18 20:22 20:58 21:05
NCAA Championship 11/23 468 18:55 19:33 20:20 20:24 20:56 20:38 20:42





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 99.9% 11.8 342 0.6 1.7 2.5 2.9 4.2 4.3 4.9 5.7 6.6 7.0 7.1 6.8 7.5 7.7 6.7 5.5 4.1 4.0 3.2 2.6 1.6 1.1 0.8 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0
Region Championship 100% 2.1 92 6.2 78.4 11.9 2.7 0.6 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Abbey D'Agostino 100% 1.0 54.9 17.4 8.9 5.4 3.6 2.8 1.2 1.3 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0
Dana Giordano 100.0% 52.6 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.0 0.9 1.1
Sarah Delozier 99.9% 86.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1
Elizabeth Markowitz 99.9% 145.6
Alison Lanois 99.9% 157.5
Hannah Rowe 99.9% 193.3
Sarah Bennett 99.9% 217.2


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Abbey D'Agostino 1.0 76.6 15.8 5.1 1.6 0.7 0.2 0.0
Dana Giordano 9.7 0.2 1.0 2.1 3.9 5.8 8.1 10.8 10.4 10.8 10.3 7.4 6.3 5.0 4.3 3.3 2.4 2.1 1.7 1.0 0.9 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.2
Sarah Delozier 15.3 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.7 1.4 2.3 3.2 4.8 6.2 6.7 7.6 7.3 6.8 7.0 6.0 5.9 5.1 4.2 3.7 3.4 3.4 2.0 2.1
Elizabeth Markowitz 28.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.2 1.8 2.1 2.1 2.9 3.3 3.1 3.3 3.8 3.8 4.0
Alison Lanois 31.8 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.6 1.0 1.0 1.6 1.7 2.5 2.3 2.7 2.9 3.4 3.7
Hannah Rowe 46.6 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.8 0.9
Sarah Bennett 59.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 6.2% 100.0% 6.2 6.2 1
2 78.4% 100.0% 78.4 78.4 2
3 11.9% 100.0% 4.1 6.8 0.9 0.1 0.0 0.0 11.9 3
4 2.7% 100.0% 0.2 0.6 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 2.7 4
5 0.6% 96.8% 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.6 5
6 0.1% 40.0% 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
Total 100% 99.9% 6.2 78.4 4.1 7.0 1.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 84.6 15.3




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Minnesota 100.0% 1.0 1.0
Villanova 95.1% 1.0 1.0
Washington 94.2% 1.0 0.9
San Francisco 91.9% 1.0 0.9
Cornell 80.6% 3.0 2.4
Syracuse 75.6% 1.0 0.8
Notre Dame 74.1% 1.0 0.7
Vanderbilt 73.9% 1.0 0.7
Indiana 70.1% 2.0 1.4
Texas A&M 56.7% 1.0 0.6
Penn State 54.0% 1.0 0.5
Princeton 47.8% 1.0 0.5
Harvard 37.3% 3.0 1.1
Wisconsin 35.7% 1.0 0.4
Arizona State 33.7% 1.0 0.3
Boston College 31.0% 1.0 0.3
Florida 29.1% 1.0 0.3
West Virginia 10.9% 1.0 0.1
Alabama 9.4% 1.0 0.1
BYU 9.3% 1.0 0.1
Texas 8.2% 1.0 0.1
Duke 6.3% 1.0 0.1
Georgia 6.1% 1.0 0.1
North Carolina St. 4.8% 1.0 0.0
Toledo 2.9% 1.0 0.0
Columbia 1.5% 3.0 0.0
UC Davis 0.3% 1.0 0.0
Weber State 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Northwestern 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Stony Brook 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 14.5
Minimum 4.0
Maximum 21.0