Duquesne
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
330  Amber Valimont SR 20:41
464  Valerie Palermo FR 20:53
498  Haley Pisarcik SR 20:56
739  Megan Baritot FR 21:16
747  Elise Farris JR 21:16
776  Danica Snyder JR 21:18
1,038  Shelby Haitz SR 21:35
1,212  Hannah Scipio SO 21:46
1,394  Kendall Seymour JR 21:58
1,611  Abbie Marquard SO 22:11
2,042  Jenna Gigliotti SO 22:38
National Rank #105 of 340
Mid-Atlantic Region Rank #7 of 38
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.4%
Most Likely Finish 7th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 5.6%
Top 10 in Regional 98.8%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Amber Valimont Valerie Palermo Haley Pisarcik Megan Baritot Elise Farris Danica Snyder Shelby Haitz Hannah Scipio Kendall Seymour Abbie Marquard Jenna Gigliotti
Lehigh's Paul Short Run (Gold) 10/05 1009 20:42 20:38 21:00 21:07 21:07 21:06 21:17 21:56 21:56 22:15
Princeton Invitational 10/19 1054 20:35 21:07 20:48 21:22 21:25 21:23 21:39 21:50 22:20 22:58
Atlantic 10 Championships 11/02 1020 20:36 20:54 20:45 21:20 21:15 21:15 21:36 22:13 22:11 22:13
Mid-Atlantic Region Championships 11/15 1116 20:59 20:52 21:34 21:11 21:16 21:30 22:01





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.4% 29.9 787 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2
Region Championship 100% 7.3 235 0.2 1.2 4.1 15.4 37.1 29.1 9.0 2.7 0.9 0.2 0.0 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Amber Valimont 14.8% 180.4
Valerie Palermo 2.8% 201.0
Haley Pisarcik 1.6% 206.6
Megan Baritot 0.4% 232.0
Elise Farris 0.4% 232.0
Danica Snyder 0.4% 228.0
Shelby Haitz 0.4% 246.0


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Amber Valimont 26.8 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.8 1.0 0.9 1.4 2.2 2.0 2.8 2.8 3.3 4.4 3.9 4.5 4.9 4.9
Valerie Palermo 37.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.2 1.5 1.7 1.8 1.7
Haley Pisarcik 40.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.7 0.7 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.4
Megan Baritot 65.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Elise Farris 65.7 0.0 0.0 0.1
Danica Snyder 69.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
Shelby Haitz 93.3




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 0.2% 33.3% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 3
4 1.2% 21.0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.0 0.3 4
5 4.1% 0.5% 0.0 4.1 0.0 5
6 15.4% 15.4 6
7 37.1% 37.1 7
8 29.1% 29.1 8
9 9.0% 9.0 9
10 2.7% 2.7 10
11 0.9% 0.9 11
12 0.2% 0.2 12
13 0.0% 0.0 13
14 0.0% 0.0 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
Total 100% 0.4% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 99.6 0.0 0.4




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0