Georgetown
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
45  Samantha Nadel SO 19:43
66  Katrina Coogan JR 19:51
70  Rachel Schneider SR 19:53
84  Haley Pierce FR 19:59
142  Rachel Paul FR 20:13
166  Madeline Chambers JR 20:17
204  Annamarie Maag JR 20:24
218  Kelsey Smith JR 20:25
311  Bobbie Burgess FR 20:38
453  Andrea Keklak SO 20:52
830  Joanna Stevens JR 21:22
National Rank #8 of 340
Mid-Atlantic Region Rank #1 of 38
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 100.0%
Most Likely Finish 6th at Nationals


National Champion 5.1%
Top 5 at Nationals 32.9%
Top 10 at Nationals 66.7%
Top 20 at Nationals 98.0%


Regional Champion 93.5%
Top 5 in Regional 100.0%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Samantha Nadel Katrina Coogan Rachel Schneider Haley Pierce Rachel Paul Madeline Chambers Annamarie Maag Kelsey Smith Bobbie Burgess Andrea Keklak Joanna Stevens
Lehigh's Paul Short Run (Gold) 10/05 486 19:53 19:55 20:02 20:34 21:03 20:39 20:16 20:39 21:23
Pre-National Invitational (Blue) 10/19 279 19:38 19:42 19:58 19:55 20:08 19:54 20:44
Big East Championships 11/02 300 19:34 19:54 19:34 20:14 19:54 20:55 20:16 20:24 20:53
Mid-Atlantic Region Championships 11/15 411 19:57 20:08 20:02 20:08 20:00 20:08 20:20
NCAA Championship 11/23 308 19:43 19:49 19:56 19:46 20:23 20:09 20:37





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 100% 8.6 286 5.1 6.4 7.0 7.1 7.3 7.8 7.4 6.3 6.9 5.5 5.8 4.5 4.3 3.7 3.5 3.3 2.4 1.5 1.2 1.1 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Region Championship 100% 1.1 34 93.5 6.1 0.3 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Samantha Nadel 100% 47.6 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.3 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.2
Katrina Coogan 100% 64.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.6
Rachel Schneider 100% 68.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4
Haley Pierce 100% 83.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2
Rachel Paul 100% 121.4 0.0 0.0
Madeline Chambers 100% 131.4 0.0
Annamarie Maag 100% 152.1


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Samantha Nadel 2.9 4.7 24.4 24.4 18.8 12.5 7.0 4.1 1.6 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Katrina Coogan 4.6 1.2 7.4 13.7 16.9 17.8 15.4 9.8 6.0 3.9 2.5 1.4 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
Rachel Schneider 5.0 1.0 5.9 11.1 14.9 16.9 15.7 11.9 7.4 4.6 3.5 2.3 1.4 1.1 1.0 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0
Haley Pierce 6.6 0.3 1.7 4.2 7.8 11.4 15.0 15.7 11.5 8.1 6.5 5.0 3.1 2.6 1.9 1.3 1.2 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0
Rachel Paul 11.4 0.0 0.4 0.8 1.6 2.5 5.4 9.3 9.5 8.8 8.2 7.9 6.3 6.3 5.0 4.9 4.2 3.3 3.0 2.6 2.1 1.9 1.2 1.0 0.9
Madeline Chambers 12.9 0.1 0.3 0.5 1.9 4.0 6.1 7.6 7.6 8.4 7.3 6.7 6.4 5.8 5.2 4.7 4.6 3.7 3.1 2.9 2.4 2.2 1.7 1.3
Annamarie Maag 16.9 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.5 1.1 2.1 3.4 4.6 4.9 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.6 5.6 6.3 5.6 5.0 5.3 4.5 4.2 3.6 3.2 3.2




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 93.5% 100.0% 93.5 93.5 1
2 6.1% 100.0% 6.1 6.1 2
3 0.3% 100.0% 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.3 3
4 0.0% 100.0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
Total 100% 100.0% 93.5 6.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 99.7 0.3




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Florida State 100.0% 1.0 1.0
Colorado 100.0% 1.0 1.0
Virginia 100.0% 1.0 1.0
Dartmouth 99.8% 1.0 1.0
Michigan 99.8% 1.0 1.0
Butler 99.7% 2.0 2.0
William and Mary 95.9% 1.0 1.0
Villanova 95.1% 3.0 2.9
Oregon 92.8% 1.0 0.9
Cornell 80.6% 1.0 0.8
Indiana 70.1% 1.0 0.7
Stanford 68.7% 1.0 0.7
Penn State 54.0% 2.0 1.1
Princeton 47.8% 1.0 0.5
Harvard 37.3% 1.0 0.4
SMU 33.5% 1.0 0.3
Kentucky 30.4% 1.0 0.3
Boise State 16.2% 1.0 0.2
Mississippi 15.0% 1.0 0.1
West Virginia 10.9% 1.0 0.1
Alabama 9.4% 1.0 0.1
Baylor 3.8% 1.0 0.0
Toledo 2.9% 2.0 0.1
UTSA 2.6% 1.0 0.0
Columbia 1.5% 1.0 0.0
Lamar 1.2% 1.0 0.0
Lipscomb 0.7% 1.0 0.0
Cal Poly 0.6% 1.0 0.0
Oklahoma State 0.4% 1.0 0.0
Northern Arizona 0.4% 1.0 0.0
Southern Illinois 0.3% 1.0 0.0
Ohio State 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Eastern Kentucky 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Tulsa 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Kansas 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Portland 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 17.2
Minimum 10.0
Maximum 24.0