Iona
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
6  Kate Avery SO 19:12
165  Maya Rehberg FR 20:17
307  Kirsten Stewart SR 20:38
495  Katie Niblock SR 20:56
1,081  Tara Jameson JR 21:38
1,434  Regina Neumeyer SO 22:00
1,447  Luci McLoughlin SR 22:01
2,128  Zoe Wojtech FR 22:44
2,221  Leigh Mazzella JR 22:49
2,317  Marlene Delices SO 22:57
3,229  Courtney Veilleux JR 24:24
3,767  Julie Gavin FR 27:18
3,772  Kerri Sexton FR 27:22
National Rank #35 of 340
Northeast Region Rank #7 of 42
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 3.4%
Most Likely Finish 9th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.4%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 7.5%
Top 10 in Regional 84.2%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Kate Avery Maya Rehberg Kirsten Stewart Katie Niblock Tara Jameson Regina Neumeyer Luci McLoughlin Zoe Wojtech Leigh Mazzella Marlene Delices Courtney Veilleux
Lehigh's Paul Short Run (Gold) 10/05 709 19:29 20:05 20:43 20:34 22:14 22:22 22:54 23:11
NYC Metro Championships 10/11
Pre-National Invitational (Blue) 10/19 768 19:27 20:18 20:40 20:55 21:59 22:23 22:55
MAAC Championships 11/01 848 19:38 20:33 20:40 21:09 22:54 21:53 24:47 22:39 22:47 24:24
Northeast Region Championships 11/15 745 19:23 20:15 20:29 21:06 21:38 21:33 22:51
NCAA Championship 11/23 18:59





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 3.4% 24.1 572 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1
Region Championship 100% 8.6 257 0.2 1.9 5.4 7.9 13.4 18.4 18.7 18.2 9.4 4.0 1.6 0.7 0.1 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Kate Avery 100% 7.8 4.6 8.0 7.7 7.5 6.5 6.5 5.6 4.7 5.1 4.0 3.3 3.2 3.1 2.7 2.7 2.0 2.3 2.3 1.4 1.8 1.3 1.3 1.4 0.9 1.1
Maya Rehberg 7.0% 102.8 0.0
Kirsten Stewart 3.4% 157.5
Katie Niblock 3.4% 198.5
Tara Jameson 3.4% 245.8
Regina Neumeyer 3.4% 250.7
Luci McLoughlin 3.4% 251.0


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Kate Avery 2.4 9.6 31.9 23.2 14.7 9.2 5.4 2.8 1.5 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0
Maya Rehberg 25.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.6 1.2 1.1 1.5 2.1 2.2 2.4 3.0 3.7 3.5 4.5 5.2 4.5 4.3 4.3 4.5
Kirsten Stewart 44.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.7 0.7 0.6 1.0 1.0
Katie Niblock 65.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
Tara Jameson 115.1
Regina Neumeyer 147.3
Luci McLoughlin 147.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 0.2% 58.3% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 3
4 1.9% 61.3% 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.7 1.1 4
5 5.4% 24.4% 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 4.1 1.3 5
6 7.9% 8.9% 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 7.2 0.7 6
7 13.4% 0.6% 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.3 0.1 7
8 18.4% 18.4 8
9 18.7% 18.7 9
10 18.2% 18.2 10
11 9.4% 9.4 11
12 4.0% 4.0 12
13 1.6% 1.6 13
14 0.7% 0.7 14
15 0.1% 0.1 15
16 0.0% 0.0 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
Total 100% 3.4% 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.6 96.6 0.0 3.4




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Baylor 3.8% 1.0 0.0
Toledo 2.9% 1.0 0.0
UTSA 2.6% 1.0 0.0
Lamar 1.2% 1.0 0.0
Lipscomb 0.7% 1.0 0.0
Oklahoma State 0.4% 1.0 0.0
Northern Arizona 0.4% 1.0 0.0
Southern Illinois 0.3% 1.0 0.0
Ohio State 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Tulsa 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Eastern Kentucky 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Kansas 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Portland 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.1
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 4.0