Nebraska
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
622  Anna Peer FR 21:08
737  Isabel Andrade SR 21:16
1,299  Shawnice Williams JR 21:52
1,312  Sarah Larson JR 21:53
1,340  Kristi Oslund FR 21:55
1,621  Megan Lush JR 22:12
1,789  Hannah Edwards JR 22:21
2,063  Jessica Wright JR 22:40
2,120  Theresa Keller SO 22:44
2,216  Sarah Plambeck SR 22:49
2,250  Katherine Howard SR 22:52
National Rank #161 of 340
Midwest Region Rank #23 of 36
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 19th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.1%
Top 20 in Regional 64.9%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Anna Peer Isabel Andrade Shawnice Williams Sarah Larson Kristi Oslund Megan Lush Hannah Edwards Jessica Wright Theresa Keller Sarah Plambeck Katherine Howard
Roy Griak Invitational 09/28 1233 21:16 22:25 21:51 22:00 22:11 22:03 22:48 22:36 22:37
South Dakota Tim Young Invite 10/19 1229 21:15 21:40 21:57 22:03 22:59 22:19 22:34 22:35 23:06 23:18
Big Ten Championships 11/03 1169 20:57 21:06 21:43 21:33 21:55 21:50 22:49 22:37 23:08
Midwest Region Championships 11/15 1206 21:14 21:14 21:41 22:20 21:43 22:15 22:39





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 19.6 546 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 1.4 3.4 7.0 9.7 13.4 15.1 14.3 12.4 9.0 5.9 3.3 2.4 1.2 0.6 0.4 0.0



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Anna Peer 65.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1
Isabel Andrade 78.2 0.0 0.0
Shawnice Williams 131.7
Sarah Larson 133.5
Kristi Oslund 136.1
Megan Lush 160.0
Hannah Edwards 172.0




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 0.0% 0.0 9
10 0.0% 0.0 10
11 0.0% 0.0 11
12 0.1% 0.1 12
13 0.3% 0.3 13
14 1.4% 1.4 14
15 3.4% 3.4 15
16 7.0% 7.0 16
17 9.7% 9.7 17
18 13.4% 13.4 18
19 15.1% 15.1 19
20 14.3% 14.3 20
21 12.4% 12.4 21
22 9.0% 9.0 22
23 5.9% 5.9 23
24 3.3% 3.3 24
25 2.4% 2.4 25
26 1.2% 1.2 26
27 0.6% 0.6 27
28 0.4% 0.4 28
29 0.0% 0.0 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0