Nevada
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
289  Demerey Kirsch JR 20:35
486  Samantha Diaz SR 20:55
664  Emily Myers SO 21:11
1,067  Erika Root SO 21:37
1,168  Julie Pedersen SR 21:43
1,210  Caitlin Devitt-Payne JR 21:46
1,844  Laura Palacios FR 22:25
1,983  Cheyenne Hunter FR 22:34
2,175  Katie Romanko SO 22:46
2,612  Dagny Signorelli SO 23:15
2,969  Kristen Morrill FR 23:48
3,026  Wynne Allen FR 23:55
National Rank #118 of 340
Mountain Region Rank #9 of 20
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 11th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 2.1%
Top 10 in Regional 56.3%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Demerey Kirsch Samantha Diaz Emily Myers Erika Root Julie Pedersen Caitlin Devitt-Payne Laura Palacios Cheyenne Hunter Katie Romanko Dagny Signorelli Kristen Morrill
Sacremento State Inter-Regional Jamboree 10/04 1145 20:41 21:10 21:32 21:36 22:41 23:04 22:46 23:15 23:47
Pre-National Invitational (White) 10/19 1216 20:57 21:16 22:23 22:57 22:30
Mountain West Championships 11/01 1116 20:39 21:16 21:04 21:36 21:48 21:44 21:56 22:12
Mountain Region Championships 11/15 1037 20:28 20:38 21:14 21:46 21:40 21:35 22:08





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 10.0 279 0.0 0.4 1.7 4.2 7.7 10.1 14.9 17.4 18.6 14.4 7.8 2.2 0.5 0.1 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Demerey Kirsch 6.1% 161.7
Samantha Diaz 0.1% 181.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Demerey Kirsch 22.9 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.2 1.3 1.8 2.7 3.1 3.5 3.6 4.0 4.5 4.7 4.8 4.4 4.6 5.0 4.7 4.5
Samantha Diaz 37.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.7 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.7
Emily Myers 51.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.3
Erika Root 81.2
Julie Pedersen 87.4
Caitlin Devitt-Payne 90.0
Laura Palacios 116.5




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 0.0% 0.0 3
4 0.4% 0.4 4
5 1.7% 1.7 5
6 4.2% 4.2 6
7 7.7% 7.7 7
8 10.1% 10.1 8
9 14.9% 14.9 9
10 17.4% 17.4 10
11 18.6% 18.6 11
12 14.4% 14.4 12
13 7.8% 7.8 13
14 2.2% 2.2 14
15 0.5% 0.5 15
16 0.1% 0.1 16
17 17
18 0.0% 0.0 18
19 19
20 20
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0