Stetson
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
2,347  Amanda Spring FR 22:59
2,401  Adrienne DeVita SO 23:02
2,773  Samantha Hicks FR 23:30
2,995  Sabrina Guszvany SR 23:51
3,112  Trixi Menge SO 24:05
3,127  Jessica Cosgrove SO 24:08
3,232  Clarissa Consol FR 24:24
3,260  Daniella Moreno FR 24:28
3,333  Valerie Hiller FR 24:41
3,395  Shelby Block SO 24:53
3,426  Emily Nolen FR 25:00
3,629  Emmie Wenzell SO 26:03
3,724  Nicole Garrabrant FR 26:45
3,731  Shannon Harrell SR 26:48
3,851  Susan Scaggs SO 29:53
National Rank #293 of 340
South Region Rank #36 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 36th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Amanda Spring Adrienne DeVita Samantha Hicks Sabrina Guszvany Trixi Menge Jessica Cosgrove Clarissa Consol Daniella Moreno Valerie Hiller Shelby Block Emily Nolen
UCF Invitational 10/18 1449 22:40 23:59 24:09 24:17 23:39 24:42 24:29 25:01
Atlantic Sun Championship 11/02 1423 22:59 23:27 23:30 23:51 24:15 24:06 24:35 25:27 25:21





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 36.2 1061



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Amanda Spring 183.5
Adrienne DeVita 186.8
Samantha Hicks 215.3
Sabrina Guszvany 234.2
Trixi Menge 244.7
Jessica Cosgrove 246.6
Clarissa Consol 257.5




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 0.0% 0.0 33
34 3.9% 3.9 34
35 19.9% 19.9 35
36 41.4% 41.4 36
37 27.6% 27.6 37
38 6.0% 6.0 38
39 1.0% 1.0 39
40 0.2% 0.2 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0