Tulsa
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
405  Natasha Cockram JR 20:48
470  Katherine Camp SR 20:54
485  Rachel Baptista SO 20:55
536  Stacie Taylor FR 21:01
556  Brandi Krieg JR 21:03
925  Emily Dunn JR 21:28
974  Clara Langley FR 21:32
1,093  Janessa Dunn JR 21:39
1,467  Olivia Lopez SO 22:02
National Rank #102 of 340
Midwest Region Rank #11 of 36
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.1%
Most Likely Finish 5th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 34.8%
Top 10 in Regional 79.9%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Natasha Cockram Katherine Camp Rachel Baptista Stacie Taylor Brandi Krieg Emily Dunn Clara Langley Janessa Dunn Olivia Lopez
Pre-National Invitational (Blue) 10/19 1028 20:39 20:38 21:06 21:06 21:27 21:56 21:41
Conference USA Championships 11/02 1059 21:02 20:53 21:13 20:55 20:52 21:40 21:44 21:39 22:15
Midwest Region Championships 11/15 1097 20:47 20:58 21:09 21:19 21:28 21:22 22:09





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.1% 29.4 758 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Region Championship 100% 7.4 259 0.1 9.9 12.1 12.7 10.9 10.5 8.6 8.2 6.8 5.7 5.1 4.2 3.0 1.4 0.4 0.2 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Natasha Cockram 0.1% 142.0
Katherine Camp 0.1% 163.0
Rachel Baptista 0.1% 196.5
Stacie Taylor 0.1% 201.5
Brandi Krieg 0.1% 202.5
Emily Dunn 0.1% 223.5
Clara Langley 0.1% 245.8


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Natasha Cockram 39.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.8 1.7
Katherine Camp 45.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.9
Rachel Baptista 47.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.8
Stacie Taylor 55.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3
Brandi Krieg 58.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2
Emily Dunn 97.9
Clara Langley 104.2




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 0.1% 100.0% 0.1 0.1 2
3 9.9% 0.4% 0.0 0.0 9.9 0.0 3
4 12.1% 12.1 4
5 12.7% 12.7 5
6 10.9% 10.9 6
7 10.5% 10.5 7
8 8.6% 8.6 8
9 8.2% 8.2 9
10 6.8% 6.8 10
11 5.7% 5.7 11
12 5.1% 5.1 12
13 4.2% 4.2 13
14 3.0% 3.0 14
15 1.4% 1.4 15
16 0.4% 0.4 16
17 0.2% 0.2 17
18 18
19 0.0% 0.0 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
Total 100% 0.1% 0.1 0.0 0.0 99.9 0.1 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Eastern Kentucky 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Kansas 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 1.0