UCLA
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
44  Kelsey Smith JR 19:43
161  Annie Mooney JR 20:16
521  Meghan Marvin JR 20:59
639  Ashlee Powers SO 21:09
786  Sierra Vega JR 21:19
912  Annabel Clark JR 21:27
916  Bronte Golick JR 21:27
973  Paige Tennison FR 21:32
975  Elle Sanders JR 21:32
1,366  Paisley Pettway JR 21:57
1,482  Aliya Shirif FR 22:03
1,578  Ava Kent JR 22:09
1,602  Kelly Brooks SO 22:10
1,637  Rachel Brajkovich FR 22:13
1,700  Jen Owen SO 22:16
1,833  Nicole Evans FR 22:24
2,217  Kristina Rivera SR 22:49
2,556  Caitlin Schmitt SR 23:10
2,645  Amber Murakami SR 23:18
2,676  Merissa Kado JR 23:21
National Rank #48 of 340
West Region Rank #11 of 39
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.2%
Most Likely Finish 11th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.1%
Top 10 in Regional 32.9%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Kelsey Smith Annie Mooney Meghan Marvin Ashlee Powers Sierra Vega Annabel Clark Bronte Golick Paige Tennison Elle Sanders Paisley Pettway Aliya Shirif
Sacremento State Inter-Regional Jamboree 10/04 836 20:03 20:18 21:02 21:48 21:30 21:14 21:00 21:27 20:54
UCLA Double Dual 10/11 1238 21:28 21:50 22:07
Wisconsin adidas Invitational 10/19 826 19:51 20:04 20:58 22:02 21:18 21:23 21:25 21:45 22:28
Titan Invitational 10/25 1236 21:42 22:02
Pac-12 Championships 11/02 745 19:16 20:03 21:04 21:20 20:51 21:48 22:26 21:58 22:26
West Region Championships 11/15 869 19:39 20:57 20:54 20:43 21:25 21:40 21:19





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.2% 27.2 623 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Region Championship 100% 11.4 331 0.0 0.1 0.8 2.8 5.4 9.8 13.9 18.8 18.3 14.7 7.9 4.1 2.0 0.9 0.3 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Kelsey Smith 82.4% 53.2 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.0 0.9 0.8 1.1
Annie Mooney 1.2% 101.0
Meghan Marvin 0.2% 211.5
Ashlee Powers 0.2% 220.5
Sierra Vega 0.2% 234.5
Annabel Clark 0.2% 243.3
Bronte Golick 0.2% 242.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Kelsey Smith 10.6 0.1 0.5 1.0 1.9 3.3 4.7 5.6 6.8 8.6 10.9 10.4 8.8 7.9 5.8 4.6 3.8 2.7 2.5 1.8 1.2 1.4 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.5
Annie Mooney 32.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.8 1.3 1.4 1.9 1.7 2.0 2.2 2.4 3.0 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.6
Meghan Marvin 82.4 0.0
Ashlee Powers 96.4
Sierra Vega 110.0
Annabel Clark 122.2
Bronte Golick 123.0




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 0.0% 0.0 4
5 0.1% 83.3% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 5
6 0.8% 2.5% 0.0 0.8 0.0 6
7 2.8% 2.2% 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.7 0.1 7
8 5.4% 5.4 8
9 9.8% 9.8 9
10 13.9% 13.9 10
11 18.8% 18.8 11
12 18.3% 18.3 12
13 14.7% 14.7 13
14 7.9% 7.9 14
15 4.1% 4.1 15
16 2.0% 2.0 16
17 0.9% 0.9 17
18 0.3% 0.3 18
19 0.1% 0.1 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
Total 100% 0.2% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 99.8 0.0 0.2




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Georgia 6.1% 1.0 0.1
Columbia 1.5% 1.0 0.0
Cal Poly 0.6% 1.0 0.0
UC Davis 0.3% 1.0 0.0
Weber State 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Northwestern 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Stony Brook 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.1
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 2.0