Utah
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
103  Rebekah Winterton JR 20:04
202  Susannah Hurst JR 20:23
576  Andrea Chavez SO 21:04
1,063  AuraLea Fain JR 21:37
1,132  Becky Sarmiento FR 21:41
1,133  Nikki Rietz JR 21:41
1,615  Dana Snell FR 22:11
1,716  Jessica Sams FR 22:17
2,156  Lauren Mills JR 22:45
3,041  Makenzie Clark FR 23:57
National Rank #70 of 340
Mountain Region Rank #6 of 20
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 7th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 11.3%
Top 10 in Regional 91.7%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Rebekah Winterton Susannah Hurst Andrea Chavez AuraLea Fain Becky Sarmiento Nikki Rietz Dana Snell Jessica Sams Lauren Mills Makenzie Clark
Stanford Invitational 09/28 902 20:05 20:09 21:09 21:39 21:55 22:07 22:18 22:18 23:57
Pre-National Invitational (Blue) 10/19 987 20:12 20:35 21:11 21:41 21:54 21:36 22:38
Pac-12 Championships 11/02 849 19:45 20:19 20:49 21:35 21:35 21:34 21:48 22:16 22:45
Mountain Region Championships 11/15 956 20:13 20:29 21:06 21:32 21:20 21:37 22:04
NCAA Championship 11/23 20:06





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0% 28.0 652 0.0
Region Championship 100% 7.7 232 0.4 2.2 8.7 16.0 21.2 18.2 15.4 9.5 5.4 2.0 0.8 0.1 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Rebekah Winterton 82.3% 90.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
Susannah Hurst 24.7% 133.1 0.0
Andrea Chavez 0.0% 191.0
AuraLea Fain 0.0% 245.0
Becky Sarmiento 0.0% 233.0
Nikki Rietz 0.0% 243.0
Dana Snell 0.0% 251.0


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Rebekah Winterton 8.3 0.6 1.0 3.3 6.4 8.1 8.5 10.0 9.2 9.1 9.0 8.3 6.5 4.8 3.6 3.0 2.1 2.0 1.2 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1
Susannah Hurst 16.1 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.5 1.4 1.2 2.1 2.5 4.4 5.4 6.6 6.4 6.2 6.4 5.8 5.9 5.2 4.9 5.0 4.3 3.5 3.4 2.7 2.7
Andrea Chavez 45.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.7
AuraLea Fain 80.8
Becky Sarmiento 85.2
Nikki Rietz 85.2
Dana Snell 109.5




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 0.4% 9.1% 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 3
4 2.2% 2.2 4
5 8.7% 8.7 5
6 16.0% 16.0 6
7 21.2% 21.2 7
8 18.2% 18.2 8
9 15.4% 15.4 9
10 9.5% 9.5 10
11 5.4% 5.4 11
12 2.0% 2.0 12
13 0.8% 0.8 13
14 0.1% 0.1 14
15 0.0% 0.0 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
Total 100% 0.0% 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Eastern Kentucky 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 1.0