Hofstra
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
2,421  Eva holtermann SR 23:01
2,813  Becky Celorio JR 23:38
3,102  Lisa Eberwein JR 24:08
3,218  Megan Tidey FR 24:26
3,242  Irene Garidas FR 24:30
3,249  Emily McLean FR 24:31
3,355  Eva Holtermann SR 24:51
3,437  Ruby Staplehurst SR 25:13
3,534  Amanda Sullivan FR 25:44
3,740  Kristin Politi FR 27:45
3,801  Ria Shah FR 29:26
3,804  Nicole Swanson FR 29:33
National Rank #305 of 341
Northeast Region Rank #41 of 43
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 41st at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Eva holtermann Becky Celorio Lisa Eberwein Megan Tidey Irene Garidas Emily McLean Eva Holtermann Ruby Staplehurst Amanda Sullivan Kristin Politi Ria Shah
Lehigh Paul Short Run (Brown) 10/04 1565 23:29 24:27 25:09 24:35 24:55 31:05
Princeton Invitational 10/18 1497 23:26 23:40 24:21 25:41 24:47 24:05 25:13 25:50
Colonial Athletic Association Championship 11/01 1539 24:07 24:31 24:24 24:23 24:20 24:55 25:40 27:49 27:49
Northeast Region Championships 11/14 1541 23:53 24:10 24:06 24:26 25:13 27:36





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 40.8 1293



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Eva holtermann 221.0
Becky Celorio 250.0
Lisa Eberwein 269.6
Megan Tidey 277.4
Irene Garidas 279.3
Emily McLean 279.5
Eva Holtermann 285.5




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 0.6% 0.6 39
40 19.4% 19.4 40
41 78.2% 78.2 41
42 1.7% 1.7 42
43 43
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0