UCLA
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
75  Kelsey Smith SR 19:57
165  Bronte Golick SR 20:18
177  Meghan Marvin SR 20:20
227  Annie Mooney SR 20:28
478  Aliya Shirif SO 20:55
634  Emily Scharmann FR 21:07
690  Veronica Yamane FR 21:11
744  Valerie Morrison FR 21:15
938  Jen Owen JR 21:29
1,182  Kelly Brooks JR 21:45
1,232  Rachel Brajkovich SO 21:48
1,235  Jessica Cushing-Murray FR 21:48
1,785  Emily Fieberling 22:21
National Rank #29 of 341
West Region Rank #6 of 39
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 72.1%
Most Likely Finish 26th at Nationals


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.1%
Top 10 at Nationals 1.5%
Top 20 at Nationals 22.6%


Regional Champion 0.5%
Top 5 in Regional 46.3%
Top 10 in Regional 98.7%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Kelsey Smith Bronte Golick Meghan Marvin Annie Mooney Aliya Shirif Emily Scharmann Veronica Yamane Valerie Morrison Jen Owen Kelly Brooks Rachel Brajkovich
Washington Invitational 10/04 738 20:01 20:34 20:40 20:29 20:43 20:39 20:55 21:10 21:45
Dual at the Rose Bowl 10/09 1219 21:14 22:45 21:49 21:35
Wisconsin adidas Invitational 10/17 694 19:59 20:18 20:41 20:23 20:48 21:00 20:51
CS Fullerton Titan 10/24 1236 21:26 21:46 21:43
Pac-12 Championships 10/31 701 19:54 20:16 20:29 20:50 20:39 20:50 21:10 21:17 21:21 22:10
West Region Championships 11/14 600 19:48 20:19 19:55 20:22 21:15 21:41 21:22
NCAA Championship 11/22 709 20:02 20:06 20:32 20:23 21:42 22:12 22:06





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 72.1% 22.8 543 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.9 1.0 1.4 1.6 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.7 3.1 3.8 4.2 4.4 4.7 4.7 4.9 5.1 5.0 4.2 4.7 4.4 3.3
Region Championship 100% 5.8 198 0.5 2.1 5.8 15.6 22.4 21.4 14.8 9.3 4.8 2.2 0.7 0.4 0.1 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Kelsey Smith 76.0% 67.8 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.3
Bronte Golick 72.2% 125.9
Meghan Marvin 72.1% 132.3
Annie Mooney 72.1% 154.6
Aliya Shirif 72.1% 214.1
Emily Scharmann 72.1% 231.9
Veronica Yamane 72.1% 236.0


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Kelsey Smith 13.4 0.2 0.7 1.4 3.1 5.5 6.9 6.9 6.6 5.8 5.8 5.1 4.9 4.9 4.4 4.3 4.2 3.3 3.3 2.4 2.9 2.3 2.1 1.6
Bronte Golick 30.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.6 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.6 2.9 2.8 2.8
Meghan Marvin 33.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.8 1.2 1.5 1.7 1.8 2.2 2.0 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.6
Annie Mooney 41.7 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.1 1.4
Aliya Shirif 74.1 0.0 0.0
Emily Scharmann 91.6
Veronica Yamane 98.2




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 0.5% 100.0% 0.5 0.5 1
2 2.1% 100.0% 2.1 2.1 2
3 5.8% 99.0% 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.1 5.7 3
4 15.6% 98.1% 0.1 0.3 0.8 1.1 1.7 1.8 1.5 1.7 2.0 2.2 1.9 0.2 0.3 15.3 4
5 22.4% 91.3% 0.1 0.3 1.1 1.4 2.3 2.6 2.3 3.2 2.8 2.9 1.6 1.9 20.5 5
6 21.4% 81.3% 0.2 0.9 1.4 1.6 2.7 2.1 2.5 1.9 2.1 1.9 4.0 17.4 6
7 14.8% 67.5% 0.1 0.9 1.2 1.6 1.4 1.8 1.0 0.8 1.1 4.8 10.0 7
8 9.3% 8.2% 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 8.5 0.8 8
9 4.8% 4.8 9
10 2.2% 2.2 10
11 0.7% 0.7 11
12 0.4% 0.4 12
13 0.1% 0.1 13
14 0.0% 0.0 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
Total 100% 72.1% 0.5 2.1 0.1 0.2 0.8 1.6 3.6 6.0 7.6 9.2 8.4 10.4 8.6 8.1 5.0 27.9 2.5 69.6




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Iona 84.9% 1.0 0.8
Arizona State 64.7% 1.0 0.6
Boston College 55.0% 1.0 0.6
Providence 53.2% 1.0 0.5
William and Mary 52.5% 1.0 0.5
Notre Dame 49.0% 1.0 0.5
BYU 42.7% 1.0 0.4
SMU 18.3% 1.0 0.2
Columbia 3.0% 1.0 0.0
Cornell 1.3% 1.0 0.0
Harvard 1.1% 1.0 0.0
California 0.7% 1.0 0.0
Florida 0.7% 1.0 0.0
Portland 0.4% 1.0 0.0
Indiana 0.4% 2.0 0.0
Wyoming 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Villanova 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Northern Arizona 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Texas A&M 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Oklahoma 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Utah 0.0% 2.0 0.0
Weber State 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 4.3
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 8.0