Brown
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
232  Lucy Van Kleunen SO 20:29
313  Natalie Schudrowitz FR 20:38
421  Leah Eickhoff SR 20:50
532  Lydia Davenport JR 20:59
719  Lily Harrington JR 21:13
756  Abigail Jones SR 21:16
996  Megan Ratcliffe FR 21:33
1,082  Quinn Bornstein FR 21:38
1,170  Victoria O'Neil JR 21:44
1,274  Sophie Mateu JR 21:50
1,310  Clare Peabody FR 21:52
1,488  Taylor Worthy SO 22:03
1,596  Charlotte Walmsley JR 22:09
1,654  Alexandra Conway SR 22:12
1,676  Sarah Yoho FR 22:13
1,852  Cecile Harmange JR 22:25
2,050  Jeanine Noordam FR 22:38
2,233  Alexis Van Pernis FR 22:49
2,477  Joelle Feinberg FR 23:06
2,522  Abigail Braiman JR 23:10
2,583  Catherine Hebson JR 23:15
2,753  Fiona Beltram FR 23:31
3,171  Katie Lomuto SO 24:19
3,323  Luci Cooke SO 24:45
National Rank #70 of 341
Northeast Region Rank #11 of 43
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 2.8%
Most Likely Finish 10th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.1%


Regional Champion 0.1%
Top 5 in Regional 9.1%
Top 10 in Regional 65.7%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Lucy Van Kleunen Natalie Schudrowitz Leah Eickhoff Lydia Davenport Lily Harrington Abigail Jones Megan Ratcliffe Quinn Bornstein Victoria O'Neil Sophie Mateu Clare Peabody
Lehigh Paul Short Run (Gold) 10/04 952 20:32 20:49 20:48 21:01 20:47 21:28 21:33 21:50 21:56 21:22
NWICAAA Championship 10/11 1175 20:43 21:35 21:42
Brown University 10/17 1039 20:35 20:54 20:58 21:11 21:17 21:33 21:47 21:41 21:58 22:25
Ivy League Championships 11/01 972 20:31 20:35 20:49 21:13 21:15 21:23 21:29 21:28 21:45 21:33
Northeast Region Championships 11/14 859 20:17 20:26 20:46 20:45 21:52 21:04 21:43





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 2.8% 28.7 677 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.9
Region Championship 100% 9.2 259 0.1 0.6 1.3 2.9 4.3 6.4 8.5 12.7 14.2 14.8 13.8 11.1 6.2 2.6 0.6 0.0 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Lucy Van Kleunen 3.6% 121.2
Natalie Schudrowitz 2.8% 146.1
Leah Eickhoff 2.8% 175.4
Lydia Davenport 2.8% 194.8
Lily Harrington 2.8% 222.3
Abigail Jones 2.8% 226.2
Megan Ratcliffe 2.8% 243.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Lucy Van Kleunen 26.4 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.4 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.6 2.3 2.5 3.6 4.4 4.1 4.5 4.9 4.6 5.1
Natalie Schudrowitz 34.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.8 0.7 1.1 1.3 2.1 2.1 2.8 2.7 3.1
Leah Eickhoff 48.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.9
Lydia Davenport 61.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2
Lily Harrington 86.0
Abigail Jones 90.8
Megan Ratcliffe 117.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 0.1% 100.0% 0.1 0.1 1
2 0.6% 100.0% 0.6 0.6 2
3 1.3% 60.6% 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.8 3
4 2.9% 26.9% 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.8 4
5 4.3% 10.8% 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.5 5
6 6.4% 2.2% 0.1 0.0 0.0 6.2 0.1 6
7 8.5% 8.5 7
8 12.7% 12.7 8
9 14.2% 14.2 9
10 14.8% 14.8 10
11 13.8% 13.8 11
12 11.1% 11.1 12
13 6.2% 6.2 13
14 2.6% 2.6 14
15 0.6% 0.6 15
16 0.0% 0.0 16
17 0.0% 0.0 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
Total 100% 2.8% 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 97.2 0.6 2.2




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Iona 84.9% 1.0 0.8
Alabama 2.8% 1.0 0.0
Florida 0.7% 1.0 0.0
Miss State 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.9
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 2.0