Central Arkansas
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,243  Brigette Caruthers SO 21:48
1,551  Diana Moreno FR 22:06
2,574  Layne Sargussen FR 23:14
2,747  Sophie Clauss JR 23:30
2,916  Layne Sargeson FR 23:47
2,977  Madison Sewell SO 23:53
3,316  Emily Carroll SR 24:44
3,329  Madison Sellars FR 24:45
3,382  Helen Senesse FR 24:58
3,462  Bret-Shelby Gordon FR 25:23
National Rank #273 of 341
South Central Region Rank #24 of 35
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 24th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.8%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Brigette Caruthers Diana Moreno Layne Sargussen Sophie Clauss Layne Sargeson Madison Sewell Emily Carroll Madison Sellars Helen Senesse Bret-Shelby Gordon
Rhodes Invitational 09/27 1349 21:57 22:06 23:14 23:28 23:53 24:46 24:28 25:10 25:14
Chile Pepper Festival 10/04 1457 22:22 23:36 23:45 25:05 24:43 24:26 25:34
ISU Pre-National Invitational (White) 10/18 1411 21:41 21:53 23:34 24:44 24:32
Southland Conference Championships 11/03 1487 21:48 23:43 23:51 24:39 25:27 26:29
South Central Region Championships 11/14 21:49 23:10 24:25





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 23.3 658 0.1 0.1 0.7 2.9 10.6 36.6 45.7 3.1 0.2 0.0



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Brigette Caruthers 81.3
Diana Moreno 95.6
Layne Sargussen 150.5
Sophie Clauss 161.7
Layne Sargeson 171.4
Madison Sewell 174.2
Emily Carroll 189.9




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 0.1% 0.1 18
19 0.1% 0.1 19
20 0.7% 0.7 20
21 2.9% 2.9 21
22 10.6% 10.6 22
23 36.6% 36.6 23
24 45.7% 45.7 24
25 3.1% 3.1 25
26 0.2% 0.2 26
27 0.0% 0.0 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0