Dartmouth
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
39  Dana Giordano JR 19:43
77  Sarah Delozier SR 19:57
290  Ellie Gonzalez FR 20:36
360  Claudia Pham SR 20:43
391  Sarah Bennett JR 20:47
424  Reid Watson JR 20:50
658  Helen Schlachtenhaufen SO 21:09
716  Alison Lanois SR 21:13
914  Leigh Moffett FR 21:27
975  Margaret Donovan SR 21:31
1,370  Bridget O'Neill FR 21:56
1,437  Erin McConnell SO 22:00
1,581  Kennedy Jensen FR 22:08
1,970  Meghan Grela SO 22:32
1,979  Abby Livingston FR 22:32
2,071  Bridget Flynn FR 22:39
2,174  Ashley Ulrich SR 22:44
National Rank #25 of 341
Northeast Region Rank #3 of 43
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 51.4%
Most Likely Finish 31st at Nationals


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.1%
Top 20 at Nationals 3.6%


Regional Champion 2.8%
Top 5 in Regional 53.3%
Top 10 in Regional 96.1%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Dana Giordano Sarah Delozier Ellie Gonzalez Claudia Pham Sarah Bennett Reid Watson Helen Schlachtenhaufen Alison Lanois Leigh Moffett Margaret Donovan Bridget O'Neill
Coast-to-Coast Battle in Beantown 09/26 785 19:44 20:30 20:43 21:06 21:23 21:33 21:15 20:45 21:43 21:58
NWICAAA Championship 10/11 1206 21:24 21:08 21:34 21:57
Wisconsin adidas Invitational 10/17 661 19:33 19:56 20:29 20:49 21:02 21:13 21:31
Brown University 10/17 1268 22:17
Ivy League Championships 11/01 607 19:48 19:56 20:36 20:44 20:32 20:33 20:51 20:46 21:51 21:17 21:28
Northeast Region Championships 11/14 621 19:46 19:48 20:39 20:49 20:31 21:00 21:15
NCAA Championship 11/22 627 19:45 19:49 20:30 20:42 20:49 21:18 21:39





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 51.4% 27.1 624 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.4 0.6 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.5 2.1 2.5 3.0 3.8 4.0 5.7 6.5 8.3 9.0
Region Championship 100% 5.6 181 2.8 7.8 12.6 15.5 14.6 13.5 9.9 8.4 6.5 4.6 2.4 1.2 0.3 0.1 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Dana Giordano 99.2% 43.8 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.9 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.1 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.6
Ellie Gonzalez 51.4% 167.7
Claudia Pham 51.4% 185.9
Sarah Bennett 51.4% 192.6
Reid Watson 51.4% 199.1
Helen Schlachtenhaufen 51.4% 230.8
Alison Lanois 51.4% 236.4


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Dana Giordano 5.1 3.0 18.0 15.6 12.8 10.2 8.6 7.2 5.9 4.8 3.9 2.8 2.0 1.4 1.3 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0
Ellie Gonzalez 31.8 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.6 1.1 1.4 1.4 1.9 2.2 2.9 3.6 3.7 3.9
Claudia Pham 40.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.9 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.0
Sarah Bennett 43.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.6
Reid Watson 48.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.8 0.9 0.8
Helen Schlachtenhaufen 78.9 0.0 0.0
Alison Lanois 86.2




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 2.8% 100.0% 2.8 2.8 1
2 7.8% 100.0% 7.8 7.8 2
3 12.6% 96.8% 0.1 0.2 0.4 1.2 2.0 1.9 2.1 1.4 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.4 12.2 3
4 15.5% 93.8% 0.0 0.2 0.4 1.1 1.6 2.1 2.2 1.9 1.5 1.4 1.1 0.9 1.0 14.5 4
5 14.6% 65.3% 0.1 0.3 0.8 1.1 1.4 1.8 1.4 1.2 0.8 0.6 5.1 9.6 5
6 13.5% 30.6% 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.4 0.5 9.4 4.1 6
7 9.9% 4.0% 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 9.5 0.4 7
8 8.4% 8.4 8
9 6.5% 6.5 9
10 4.6% 4.6 10
11 2.4% 2.4 11
12 1.2% 1.2 12
13 0.3% 0.3 13
14 0.1% 0.1 14
15 0.0% 0.0 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
Total 100% 51.4% 2.8 7.8 0.1 0.2 0.6 1.7 3.5 4.5 5.6 5.6 5.1 4.4 4.1 2.8 2.4 48.6 10.6 40.8




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Iona 84.9% 1.0 0.8
UCLA 62.5% 1.0 0.6
Boston College 55.0% 1.0 0.6
Providence 53.2% 2.0 1.1
William and Mary 52.5% 1.0 0.5
Notre Dame 49.0% 1.0 0.5
BYU 42.7% 1.0 0.4
Princeton 19.9% 1.0 0.2
SMU 18.3% 1.0 0.2
Columbia 3.0% 3.0 0.1
Yale 2.9% 1.0 0.0
New Hampshire 2.8% 1.0 0.0
Cornell 1.3% 3.0 0.0
Harvard 1.1% 3.0 0.0
Lipscomb 1.0% 1.0 0.0
Brown 0.7% 1.0 0.0
Florida 0.7% 1.0 0.0
Indiana 0.4% 1.0 0.0
Texas A&M 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Connecticut 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Weber State 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 5.2
Minimum 1.0
Maximum 11.0