Duke
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
323  Jessie Rubin SR 20:39
530  Hannah Meier SO 20:59
540  Wesley Frazier SO 21:00
609  Haley Meier SO 21:05
625  Anima Banks JR 21:06
872  Colleen Schmidt SR 21:24
887  Madison Granger JR 21:25
1,265  Callie Wynn FR 21:50
1,287  Olivia Anderson JR 21:51
1,296  Julianna Miller SR 21:51
1,524  Paige Rice FR 22:05
1,795  Gina Daniel SO 22:22
1,846  Allison Sturges JR 22:25
2,053  Chloe Maleski SR 22:38
National Rank #96 of 341
Southeast Region Rank #12 of 49
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.1%
Most Likely Finish 10th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 1.3%
Top 10 in Regional 69.4%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Jessie Rubin Hannah Meier Wesley Frazier Haley Meier Anima Banks Colleen Schmidt Madison Granger Callie Wynn Olivia Anderson Julianna Miller Paige Rice
Coast-to-Coast Battle in Beantown 09/26 900 20:16 20:53 20:30 21:12 20:51 21:42 21:55 21:47 22:32
Royals XC Challenge 10/11 1234 21:52 21:31 21:53 21:42 22:05
Wisconsin adidas Invitational 10/17 1062 20:49 21:15 21:04 20:48 21:08 21:22 22:01
ACC Championships 10/31 1068 20:44 20:53 21:19 21:01 21:20 21:16 21:26 21:52
3 Stripe Invite 11/08 1186 20:48 21:49 21:32 22:06
Southeast Region Championships 11/14 20:42 21:23





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.1% 28.0 681 0.0 0.0 0.0
Region Championship 100% 9.5 304 0.0 0.1 1.2 6.1 9.3 14.0 17.3 21.5 14.9 8.9 3.8 1.9 0.7 0.3 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Jessie Rubin 1.5% 153.2
Hannah Meier 0.1% 189.5
Wesley Frazier 0.1% 191.5
Haley Meier 0.1% 203.3
Anima Banks 0.1% 193.5
Colleen Schmidt 0.1% 246.5
Madison Granger 0.1% 227.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Jessie Rubin 39.9 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.9 0.9 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.9
Hannah Meier 60.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1
Wesley Frazier 61.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1
Haley Meier 68.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Anima Banks 69.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
Colleen Schmidt 93.1
Madison Granger 94.4




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 0.0% 100.0% 0.0 0.0 3
4 0.1% 33.3% 0.0 0.0 0.0 4
5 1.2% 1.6% 0.0 1.2 0.0 5
6 6.1% 6.1 6
7 9.3% 9.3 7
8 14.0% 14.0 8
9 17.3% 17.3 9
10 21.5% 21.5 10
11 14.9% 14.9 11
12 8.9% 8.9 12
13 3.8% 3.8 13
14 1.9% 1.9 14
15 0.7% 0.7 15
16 0.3% 0.3 16
17 0.1% 0.1 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
Total 100% 0.1% 0.0 0.0 99.9 0.0 0.1




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Columbia 3.0% 1.0 0.0
Lipscomb 1.0% 1.0 0.0
Florida 0.7% 1.0 0.0
Connecticut 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 2.0