Eastern Michigan
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
43  Victoria Voronko SR 19:45
139  Sofie Gallein JR 20:13
260  Jordann McDermitt FR 20:32
704  Taylor Knoll SR 21:12
1,124  Amy Frauhammer JR 21:41
1,334  Marina Manjon Rivadulla SR 21:53
1,699  Danielle Benztley FR 22:15
1,801  Lauren Pottschmidt FR 22:22
1,808  Anna Aldrich SO 22:22
2,552  Rebecca Quaintance JR 23:12
National Rank #41 of 341
Great Lakes Region Rank #7 of 34
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 3.4%
Most Likely Finish 9th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.3%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 3.0%
Top 10 in Regional 94.5%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Victoria Voronko Sofie Gallein Jordann McDermitt Taylor Knoll Amy Frauhammer Marina Manjon Rivadulla Danielle Benztley Lauren Pottschmidt Anna Aldrich Rebecca Quaintance
Coast-to-Coast Battle in Beantown 09/26 786 19:47 20:17 20:21 21:37 22:01 21:38 22:03 22:22 22:22
Notre Dame Invitational (Blue) 10/03 824 19:43 20:25 20:34 21:19 21:54 22:08 21:49 22:21 24:00
ISU Pre-National Invitational (Blue) 10/18 792 19:35 20:31 20:38 20:47 21:43 21:43 22:19
MAC Championship 11/01 793 19:57 20:04 20:37 21:10 21:29 21:47 23:03 22:17 22:35
Great Lakes Region Championships 11/14 710 19:48 19:49 20:29 21:07 21:14 22:18 22:30
NCAA Championship 11/22 19:48 20:08





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 3.4% 25.3 588 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1
Region Championship 100% 8.4 246 0.1 0.4 2.6 7.0 14.8 24.1 28.0 17.6 4.6 0.8 0.1 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Victoria Voronko 99.0% 46.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.1 1.4 1.0 1.5 1.8 1.6
Sofie Gallein 36.5% 102.4 0.0
Jordann McDermitt 5.7% 145.1
Taylor Knoll 3.4% 224.7
Amy Frauhammer 3.4% 246.7
Marina Manjon Rivadulla 3.4% 249.3
Danielle Benztley 3.4% 251.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Victoria Voronko 8.7 0.1 0.4 1.3 4.9 7.5 9.1 9.9 10.3 9.7 8.3 7.8 6.6 5.7 4.2 3.4 2.8 2.5 1.7 1.1 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2
Sofie Gallein 20.8 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.6 1.0 1.4 1.9 2.2 3.1 3.6 3.9 5.0 4.6 5.6 6.2 5.6 6.3 5.2 4.3 4.3 4.7
Jordann McDermitt 35.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.5 1.0 0.8 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.5 2.7 3.0
Taylor Knoll 74.9
Amy Frauhammer 102.2
Marina Manjon Rivadulla 115.6
Danielle Benztley 141.9




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 0.1% 100.0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 3
4 0.4% 77.8% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 4
5 2.6% 42.3% 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 1.5 1.1 5
6 7.0% 25.8% 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.4 5.2 1.8 6
7 14.8% 0.8% 0.0 0.0 0.1 14.7 0.1 7
8 24.1% 0.1% 0.0 24.0 0.0 8
9 28.0% 28.0 9
10 17.6% 17.6 10
11 4.6% 4.6 11
12 0.8% 0.8 12
13 0.1% 0.1 13
14 0.0% 0.0 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
Total 100% 3.4% 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.8 96.6 0.0 3.4




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Tulsa 7.4% 1.0 0.1
Columbia 3.0% 1.0 0.0
Missouri 2.0% 1.0 0.0
Lipscomb 1.0% 1.0 0.0
Wyoming 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Kansas State 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Colorado St. 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Southern Illinois 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Connecticut 0.0% 2.0 0.0
Butler 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Eastern Kentucky 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Furman 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Elon 0.0% 2.0 0.0
Total 0.1
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 3.0